Thanks again for reply.   Yeah that is the problem DTMF from a phone won't work. It will send a notify back to ATT. I just don't know how you could do a warm transfer with this. If I try to do a conf. and send to CVP to return dynamic label. like " DTMF*8,,,,,18XXXXXXXXX". It's actually making a new call. I guess that would be the only way to send a rf back out. But trying to understand how exactly. You send to CVP. But if you do that it's a new call. So call flow would be as such.   --ATT-sip-trunk-w-xfer-connect---Sonus-SBC---CVP--CUCM--jabber-consult---agent then would have to xfer back to CVP?--rf*8XXXXXXXX   But I think this will create a new router call key and not stay on the same dialog. Which really it would just be a trunk-to-trunk xfer within ATT which we're trying to avoid.  ... View more

Thanks Jonathan.   This is what I struggle with. So ATT transfer connect will work natively with midcall DTMF. If we use a refer by going to CVP and returning a dynamic label like *8,,,XXXXXXXXXXX. I guess then ATT will know to invoke the TNT? ... View more

So this was actually for automation. Export from gui wasn't an option. API either.   But in case anyone else runs across this was able to find a query that works.   (for switch ports) run sql select erl.name, switch.switchid,switch.switchports from cererl erl,cerswitchport switch where switch.fkerl=erl.erlid (for unallocated phones) run sql select phones.macaddress, erl.name from cererl erl, cerunlocatedphone phones where phones.fkerl=erl.erlid ... View more

Couldn't they just use a sip profile to modify the contact header? ... View more

Hello,   Looking at the debugs. One thing that is pretty clear. Your ITSP never acks the 200ok that is sent out for the outside leg.    Sent: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 209.142.200.14:5060;branch=z9hG4bKbt36sc300o083b2b3oc0.1 From: "Putnam Troy" <sip:6162831477@10.1.6.4>;tag=5151883 To: <sip:6162775094@10.1.6.47:5060>;tag=4760FAB-152C Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 19:54:10 GMT Call-ID: 1548058228-14266198@SFLDMIUP-C3SIPGW CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER Allow-Events: telephone-event P-Asserted-Identity: "Troy Putnam" <sip:7771350@192.77.235.171> Contact: <sip:6162775094@192.77.235.171:5060> Supported: replaces Supported: sdp-anat Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-16.6.4 Session-ID: 1920f7f300105000a00000cae54049f2;remote=fe8eed17b6005db896eddf7fcf175241 Supported: timer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=required Content-Length: 252   And even more strange they continue to send invites in for the call. yet the cseq is still 1. ... View more

Thanks.   The concern really is just the protocol itself. They have really strict security policies. And one of those XXXX orginizations disallowed TFTP on the network.   I guess since I've seen conflicting ideas about it. I'll put up a capture and confirm for sure. Last one I didn't have a firmware upgrade to the phone. But I assumed as well TFTP would be the only way. ... View more

Thanks.   I know it will use HTTP for cnf, dial rules, CTL. I've seen this on capture. But for firmware I've only seen it try using TFTP. Just wanted to confirm there is no other protocol for the loads. ... View more

Thanks Prassha. Yes they are using standard sip profile. It seems this is happening to all users using CSF. That is what I assumed as well at first maybe it was switching between wired and wireless. Verifying what connection they are using on LAN. They way I read the syslog message is it is not liking a param it returned. I have captures so going to look at the 200ok. You can see this is cseq 105 so obviously the first couple were ok. So I need to look at what is different between a bad and good 200ok. ... View more

Thanks.   Yeah I saw that defect. My understanding tho is it is really just cosmetic and deals with the alarm definitions. ... View more

Didn't know that. Thanks for the reply O. This CUSP is on 9.1.1. Wonder when they switched. Just odd that they wouldn't allow https with all the security concerns nowdays. I mean you can even change APs to https for the gui.   Thx ... View more