ā11-07-2017 10:38 AM - edited ā03-17-2019 11:33 AM
Hi...
We have made an Sip normalisation script that add a Privacy : id header if from header is anonymous, was a demand from the telephony provider.
That works as intended , but after the call has been established for 10-15 minutes a new INVITE is sent and the call is disconnected. The telephony provider says that it is not OK to send a privacy:id in the second INVITE thats why the call is disconnected. Been reading the RFC but can't find that it should not be allowed. Anyone knows what is true here is it OK or not to send an Privacy : id in the second INVITE?
ā11-08-2017 12:10 AM
Are you having CUBE between CUCM and ITSP or direct connection? I you have a CUBE, its easier to control as CUBE profiling has INVITE and REINVITE
ā11-08-2017 01:27 AM
HI...
No CUBE, direct conection to ITSP
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide