cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
356
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

Strange DN behaiviour

Operepichay
Level 1
Level 1

Two DN's are in same partition and with same CSS.

352 DN is unable to call some destinations (fast busy) and 312 DN calls with no problems.

Phone change had no luck. When I change DN from 352 to 351 all works fine.

352 DN was created some time before and had no such problems.

352 DN has also problems with calls to some other internal DNs.

Logs are in attachments (call to number 0661234567)

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Jaime Valencia
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Without knowing the call flow, it seems the other end is rejecting the call, did you review the traces????

2016/10/10 17:10:20.628|CC|SETUP|31088991|31088992|352|0661234567|0661234567
2016/10/10 17:10:20.648|CC|OFFERED|31088991|31088992|352|0661234567|0661234567|SEP000F341294EB|ASTERISK
2016/10/10 17:10:20.649|SIPT|31088992|UDP|OUT|10.1.2.60|5060|ASTERISK|10.1.31.70|5060|1,100,14,92.15945^10.1.2.60^MTP|592618|45bc7380-7fb1a14c-34ec-3c02010a@10.1.2.60|INVITE
2016/10/10 17:10:20.651|SIPT|31088992|UDP|IN|10.1.2.60|5060|ASTERISK|10.1.31.70|5060|1,100,10,1.224463^10.1.31.70^*|592619|45bc7380-7fb1a14c-34ec-3c02010a@10.1.2.60|401 Unauthorized
2016/10/10 17:10:20.651|SIPT|31088992|UDP|OUT|10.1.2.60|5060|ASTERISK|10.1.31.70|5060|1,100,10,1.224463^10.1.31.70^*|592620|45bc7380-7fb1a14c-34ec-3c02010a@10.1.2.60|ACK
HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Aseem Anand
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

Can you share the model details tested, CUCM version with along with the Call manager SDL traces?

It could be an issue with the dbreplication. Also, check the output of the command below:

utils dbreplication runtimestate

utile dbreplication status

Aseem

Jaime Valencia
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Without knowing the call flow, it seems the other end is rejecting the call, did you review the traces????

2016/10/10 17:10:20.628|CC|SETUP|31088991|31088992|352|0661234567|0661234567
2016/10/10 17:10:20.648|CC|OFFERED|31088991|31088992|352|0661234567|0661234567|SEP000F341294EB|ASTERISK
2016/10/10 17:10:20.649|SIPT|31088992|UDP|OUT|10.1.2.60|5060|ASTERISK|10.1.31.70|5060|1,100,14,92.15945^10.1.2.60^MTP|592618|45bc7380-7fb1a14c-34ec-3c02010a@10.1.2.60|INVITE
2016/10/10 17:10:20.651|SIPT|31088992|UDP|IN|10.1.2.60|5060|ASTERISK|10.1.31.70|5060|1,100,10,1.224463^10.1.31.70^*|592619|45bc7380-7fb1a14c-34ec-3c02010a@10.1.2.60|401 Unauthorized
2016/10/10 17:10:20.651|SIPT|31088992|UDP|OUT|10.1.2.60|5060|ASTERISK|10.1.31.70|5060|1,100,10,1.224463^10.1.31.70^*|592620|45bc7380-7fb1a14c-34ec-3c02010a@10.1.2.60|ACK
HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

There was same DN registered at Asterisk.