10-02-2023 09:09 AM
Hi All,
If you peer between route reflectors clusters and have them setup as back-to-back clients does this disable the cluster-id loop prevention checks? Just i see routes being sent back to originator RR and that RR accepting them. I thought the originator would drop the route because it see's it own cluster-id?
Thanks
10-02-2023 03:02 PM
Well, I can imagine this situation in a topology with redundant route reflectors for a cluster and without configuring the same cluster-id on both of them.
But generally the cluster-id should work as loop-prevention also in your back-to-back client setup.
10-02-2023 06:53 PM
Hi @jay_7301 ,
It would certainly help if you could provide more information and a high level diagram.
Regards,
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide