cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
645
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

MPLS TE equal or unequal load balancing doesn't work?

scytmax_2
Level 1
Level 1

Dear Sir!

I've two MPLS TE tunnels from one PE to another PE.

And there are traffic share count between them

(as tunnel mpls traffic-eng load-share command define).

But in real life all traffic from the same source to the same destination go through only one tunnel

(as CEF define - i.e. how sh ip cef exact-route says).

PEs are 3660 platforms with c3660-jk9o3s-mz.123-8.T

installed.

How can I correct this problem?

Best regards,

Maxim Denisov

2 Replies 2

Harold Ritter
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

This is expected behavior since CEF is used at the head end to perform label imposition. I wouldn't recommend changing the default bahavior to per=packet loadsharing since this could lead to of of sequence packets, which could lower the overall performance.

Hope this helps,

Harold Ritter
Sr Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México
Paseo de la Reforma 222
Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México

Dear Sir!

I'm agree with you as MPLS TE tunnels are opened from PE to PE, so CEF does it work.

But if I open this tunnels from P to PE, ONLY ONE of this tunnels are used instead of load-sharing, if traffic go from one source (of site1 of VPN1) to the same destination (located at site2 of VPN1).

Why? Packet through P-devices swithes by labels, so I mean that CEF cannot does src-dst load sharing?

My problem are that I must to do load sharing between this two tunnels in the case above.

Q: How can I solve this problem?

Best regards,

Maxim Denisov