04-02-2020 02:03 AM
What is the difference between an ISE normalized radius attribute vs an ISE radius attribute?
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-03-2020 12:58 AM
The following is what I needed to know. Here is a great answer provided by Arne Bier.
A Normalised RADIUS attribute in ISE is a convenient abstraction that allows us to use a common attribute in our Policy Set Logic in a multi-vendor environment. E.g. if you have a mix of Cisco and Aruba WLC's, then you can either do it the hard way, by checking for the vendor specific attributes used, e.g. Cisco uses attribute Called-Station-ID for the SSID, and Aruba uses Aruba-Essid-Name. Perhaps a bad example, because I am no Aruba guru ;-) - but you get the point. There are other instances where vendor A signals a MAB Auth request with Service-Type = "Call-Check" and another vendor uses Service-Type = "Blah". Cisco ISE has multi-vendor support, and as long as you set the NAS with the correct Device Vendor Type ("Device Profile") then ISE does the internal mapping for you. Then you can use abstractions like Normalised Radius SSID which is vendor agnostic. You no longer need to care how it works under the hood.
Other abstractions are things like the Compound Conditions like Wireless_8021X and Wired_802.1X - have a look at those in detail and you can see that each vendor does it slightly differently.
04-02-2020 02:06 AM
please check below link, it might help you.
Thanks
Garry
04-02-2020 04:28 AM
I do not see the answer to my question in the post listed below.
04-02-2020 06:08 AM
04-03-2020 12:58 AM
The following is what I needed to know. Here is a great answer provided by Arne Bier.
A Normalised RADIUS attribute in ISE is a convenient abstraction that allows us to use a common attribute in our Policy Set Logic in a multi-vendor environment. E.g. if you have a mix of Cisco and Aruba WLC's, then you can either do it the hard way, by checking for the vendor specific attributes used, e.g. Cisco uses attribute Called-Station-ID for the SSID, and Aruba uses Aruba-Essid-Name. Perhaps a bad example, because I am no Aruba guru ;-) - but you get the point. There are other instances where vendor A signals a MAB Auth request with Service-Type = "Call-Check" and another vendor uses Service-Type = "Blah". Cisco ISE has multi-vendor support, and as long as you set the NAS with the correct Device Vendor Type ("Device Profile") then ISE does the internal mapping for you. Then you can use abstractions like Normalised Radius SSID which is vendor agnostic. You no longer need to care how it works under the hood.
Other abstractions are things like the Compound Conditions like Wireless_8021X and Wired_802.1X - have a look at those in detail and you can see that each vendor does it slightly differently.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide