I have a question about having two interfaces in a virtual CPI solution with both having default gateway.
In the setup process the default gateway is being set and it appears in the global configuration of CPI configuration.
If I add a new virtual NIC and set an IP address, is it possible to have another gateway or static route in order to make the second interface to communicate outside the local LAN segment.
Here is the example:
test-cpi/admin# show run
Generating configuration...
!
hostname test-cpi
!
ip domain-name test-cpi
!
interface GigabitEthernet 0
ip address 192.168.175.19 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address autoconfig
!
default gateway 192.168.175.1
test-cpi/admin# show interface
GigabitEthernet 0
: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.175.19 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.175.255
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea8:304a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 00:50:56:a8:30:4a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 352153 bytes 68125563 (64.9 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 290 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 15789 bytes 12861192 (12.2 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
GigabitEthernet 1
: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.255.255.255
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:feb6:685a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 00:50:56:b6:68:5a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 38897 bytes 2370632 (2.2 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 16 bytes 1296 (1.2 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 807262 bytes 503941806 (480.5 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 807262 bytes 503941806 (480.5 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
=============================================================
ade # ifconfig
eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.175.19 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.175.255
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea8:304a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 00:50:56:a8:30:4a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 354505 bytes 68558957 (65.3 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 290 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 15949 bytes 12885400 (12.2 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
eth1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.255.255.255
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:feb6:685a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 00:50:56:b6:68:5a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 38939 bytes 2374076 (2.2 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 16 bytes 1296 (1.2 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
In the current example I want GigabitEthernet 1 to be able to communicate outside the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet.
If it is possible can anybody suggest how it is done?
Thank you in advance!
