Cisco Prime - VTP Disconnected Domain Alarm
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2014 06:54 AM
sw03 is out of vtp domain, but it is, at same time, inside that same domain... how is that possible?
If I create a VLAN on sw01 (server) it is reflected to all clients (sw2 and sw3). So it's working as expected. Then, why this alarm?
Could someone explain me how to fix it?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Discrepancy Detail
Type VTP Disconnected Domain
Severity High
First Found 25 Feb 2014, 08:11:49 BRT
Description DomainName:MYDOMAIN
Detail VTPDomain MYDOMAIN with revision number 35 is disconnected.
Set1 contains the following devices:
sw03
Device type and OS version of sw03:
Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(1)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Set2 contains the following devices:
sw01
Device type and OS version of sw01:
Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(58)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
sw03
Device type and OS version of sw03:
Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(1)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
sw02
Device type and OS version of sw02:
Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(58)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SW01#sh vtp status
VTP Version capable : 1 to 3
VTP version running : 2
VTP Domain Name : MYDOMAIN
VTP Pruning Mode : Enabled
VTP Traps Generation : Enabled
Device ID : 001b.8fcc.b680
Configuration last modified by 10.64.97.2 at 7-26-13 13:34:54
Local updater ID is 10.64.97.2 on interface Vl8 (lowest numbered VLAN interface found)
Feature VLAN:
--------------
VTP Operating Mode : Server
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 1005
Number of existing VLANs : 21
Configuration Revision : 35
MD5 digest : 0x78 0x35 0x43 0xE5 0x01 0xA3 0xF4 0xDE
SW02#sh vtp status
VTP Version capable : 1 to 3
VTP version running : 2
VTP Domain Name : MYDOMAIN
VTP Pruning Mode : Enabled
VTP Traps Generation : Enabled
Device ID : 001b.d48e.7600
Configuration last modified by 10.64.97.2 at 7-26-13 13:34:54
Feature VLAN:
--------------
VTP Operating Mode : Client
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 1005
Number of existing VLANs : 21
Configuration Revision : 35
MD5 digest : 0x78 0x35 0x43 0xE5 0x01 0xA3 0xF4 0xDE
0xCE 0xDE 0xF4 0x88 0x44 0x0A 0x6D 0xBD
SW03#sh vtp status
VTP Version capable : 1 to 3
VTP version running : 2
VTP Domain Name : MYDOMAIN
VTP Pruning Mode : Enabled
VTP Traps Generation : Enabled
Device ID : 8875.560c.6280
Configuration last modified by 10.64.97.2 at 7-26-13 13:34:54
Feature VLAN:
--------------
VTP Operating Mode : Client
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 1005
Number of existing VLANs : 21
Configuration Revision : 35
MD5 digest : 0x78 0x35 0x43 0xE5 0x01 0xA3 0xF4 0xDE
0xCE 0xDE 0xF4 0x88 0x44 0x0A 0x6D 0xBD
-------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks
- Labels:
-
Network Management
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2014 07:03 AM
If you are on LMS 4.2.4, it may be :
CSCuj62537 LMS 4.2.4 wrongly report VTP disconnected domain discrepancy
As this data is collected during Data collection, sometime one failing device for DC may report incorrect descrepancy. Please run a new Data Collection for all devices or you can open Topology Map from where you can right click on affected devices and run DC directly.
You may acknowledge the Descrepancy and run new DC and see if it re-occurs. Ideally this doesnt seems to be an issue now as the revision numbers are same on all the devices.
-Thanks
Vinod
**Rating Encourages contributors, and its really free. **
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2014 09:31 AM
CSCuj62537 says:
Conditions:
VTP Domain with one device configured as VTP transparent.
But there is no VTP transparent mode involved in my case.
And yes, I have Cisco Prime 4.2 running.
I will ignore it for a while and check for new occurences
