06-22-2010 01:40 AM
Hello,
I'm just upgrading a CW LMS 2.6 environment to LMS 3.1.
I got some problems with the UT on the VSS devices. For example:
We have a fully equipped VSS with about 500 devices attached.
Since then we have exported the address table of the VSSs manually to get a suitable solution to use the User Tracking function in an external utility.
Now with 3.1 I thought UT will work directly on the VSSs. But it shows me only ~30 devices on our main VSS.
Info:
CS 3.2.0
CM 5.1.0
CV 6.1.8
CWA 1.1.0
DFM 3.1.0
LMSP 1.1.0
RME 4.2.0
Any suggestions?
Alex
06-22-2010 02:24 AM
Just checked this doc:
Our 6509s run with 12.2(33)SXI1
Should be fine.
06-23-2010 11:52 AM
Yes, the VSS should be supported, but you may be seeing a bug with Data Collection. First, try upgrading to CM 5.1.4 from Common Services > Software Center > Software Update. Then run a new Campus Data Collection followed by a UT acquisition, and see if more users show up.
06-25-2010 02:45 AM
Hello Joe,
thanks for your help.
I made an upgrade to CM 5.1.4 and restarted the system.
After Campus Data Collection has run I can't do an UT acquisition.
Error Message:
"Construction of XML data required for UT is in progress.Please try after some time"
Seems to be this one:
06-25-2010 06:20 AM
I filtered out our standalone APs and this helps as a workaround.
Data Collection and User Tracking now run smoothly again but no change:
No functional User Tracking on our VSS
Thanks in advance!
Alex
07-19-2010 12:15 PM
Post the NMSROOT/campus/etc/cwsi/portsData.xml and vlanData.xml files. What is the IP address and hostname of this VSS? What version of SNMP are you using?
07-19-2010 12:40 AM
Anybody?
08-25-2010 04:57 AM
Sorry, but confidential information in it.
We have opened a TAC. I will post the results here.
Thx for your help!
11-16-2010 07:35 AM
Just to inform you guys. The TAC didn't helped. Just another unresolved problem...
11-17-2010 11:11 PM
What was the Service Request number?
12-07-2010 06:27 AM
SR 615139375
12-09-2010 03:32 AM
I went through the notes, and I agree with the engineer's assessment. The missing MACs appear to be connected to non-access ports. Is there a specific MAC that is directly connected to this switch that is missing from the UT report?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide