07-08-2008 06:55 PM
It appears as long as LMS is bound to the one single floating virtual IP addr in gatekeeper.cfg, it should work. Nonetheless I'm wondering if there's any caveat. Does LMS play nice with IPMP's outbound load spreading feature, if at all?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-10-2008 07:19 AM
A service request would need to be opened requesting such a patch.
07-10-2008 07:25 AM
I'm not following: Do you mean a "service request" (as in a TAC case???) in order to have a patch produced for 3.1, or simply to obtain the patch?
07-10-2008 07:29 AM
A TAC service request would need to be created requesting the patch for 3.1. This is how the 3.0.1 was built.
07-10-2008 07:37 AM
Got it, will do. I assume this is because the bug was filed only against 3.0.1. Do I need concrete evidence (such as a live 3.1 install) to prove the need of a patch?
07-10-2008 07:40 AM
If you want, as this way you can validate the patch. However, it's not required.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide