cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
794
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Port-channel issues

Richard Lucht
Level 1
Level 1

We installed a CISCO 6509e with 2 Sup 720 blades in one building that is about 600m from our corporate HQs.  We have a CISC 4507 with 2 Sup 6-E with 10G.  We have them connected with fiber using 10g gbic LMR optics in the 10g ports of the sup blades.  The link comes up.  We moved it to a trunk and set up port channeling.  The link will come up as a trunk but the port channel is not coming up.  We are at a bit of a loss, we have several closets through the 2 buildings and we utilize port channeling on all of our switches.  Below are the interfaces for the 2 interfaces and port channels, we had hoped to add more interfaces to this port channel but we are on hold until we can determine the reason for the port channel not coming up.

 

6509E

 

!
interface Port-channel4
 switchport
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport mode trunk
!

interface TenGigabitEthernet5/4
 description B2B 10G
 switchport
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport mode trunk
 channel-group 4 mode auto

GigabitEthernet5/3     unassigned      YES manual down                  down    
TenGigabitEthernet5/4  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up  

 Port-channel4          unassigned      YES unset  down                  down 

 

4507

interface Port-channel8
 switchport
 switchport mode trunk

interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1
 description CORE-TO-CORE
 switchport mode trunk
 channel-group 8 mode desirable

TenGigabitEthernet1/1  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up  

Port-channel8          unassigned      YES unset  down                  down 

 

1 Reply 1

Leo Laohoo
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

The physical port-channel configuration don't match.  4500 is "desirable" while the 6500 is "auto".