cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
574
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Rapid Spanning Tree Question

Tom de Brouwer
Level 1
Level 1

All,

I have a question about Rapid Spanning Tree reconfiguration. I have to following situation:SwitchConfig.jpg

As you can see 3 switches with RSTP, and 2 switches without RSTP (or any other spanning tree, just unmanaged).

The 2 switch will form a loop in my network. Switch 1 will block one of the ports and the other port will forward the traffic.
If I break the link "Just Forwarding", my second switch won't be able to cumminucate for around 40 seconds. It will take some time before the backup link will be up again.

Cisco has the Fastforwarding  mechanism. Will this help in this situation? I would like to shorten the 40 seconds time.

Thans in advance.

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

cmarva
Level 4
Level 4

I'd guess the unmanaged devices run legacy spanning tree, and rapid
pvst switches will run rapid according the "heard" protocol. So if it hears

the legacy bpdu, it will run regular spanning tree, hence the 40 second delay.

chris

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

cmarva
Level 4
Level 4

I'd guess the unmanaged devices run legacy spanning tree, and rapid
pvst switches will run rapid according the "heard" protocol. So if it hears

the legacy bpdu, it will run regular spanning tree, hence the 40 second delay.

chris

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card