cancel
Showing results forĀ 
Search instead forĀ 
Did you mean:Ā 
cancel
20960
Views
10
Helpful
22
Replies

ASA intra-interface communication

stephilewis
Level 3
Level 3

I have three interfaces configured, outside, inside and dhcp.  The IP for the inside is 10.10.220.101 and dhcp is 10.10.230.1, with sameāˆ’securityāˆ’traffic permit intraāˆ’interface configured but still not able to communicate between interfaces.  The error I receive from packet-tracer is (acl-drop) flow is denied by configured rule.

22 Replies 22

I am heading out for the day but will run one tomorrow and post

Thank you,


edge(config)# packet-tracer input inside icmp 10.10.220.101 8 0 10.10.200.105 $

Phase: 1
Type: FLOW-LOOKUP
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Found no matching flow, creating a new flow

Phase: 2
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in   10.10.200.0     255.255.255.0   LANDHCP

Phase: 3
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype:
Result: DROP
Config:
Implicit Rule
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in  id=0x3802b20, priority=500, domain=permit, deny=true
        hits=6, user_data=0x6, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip=10.10.220.101, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0
        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Result:
input-interface: inside
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: LANDHCP
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule

edge(config)#

in  id=0x3802b20, priority=500, domain=permit, deny=true
        hits=6, user_data=0x6, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip=10.10.220.101, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0
        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Result:
input-interface: inside
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: LANDHCP
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule

edge(config)# packet-tracer input inside icmp 10.10.220.101 8 0 10.10.200.1 de$

Phase: 1
Type: FLOW-LOOKUP
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Found no matching flow, creating a new flow

Phase: 2
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in   10.10.200.1     255.255.255.255 identity

Phase: 3
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype:
Result: DROP
Config:
Implicit Rule
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in  id=0x3802b20, priority=500, domain=permit, deny=true
        hits=7, user_data=0x6, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip=10.10.220.101, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0
        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Result:
input-interface: inside
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: NP Identity Ifc
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule

edge(config)# packet-tracer input inside icmp 10.10.200.1 8 0 10.10.200.105 de$

Phase: 1
Type: FLOW-LOOKUP
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Found no matching flow, creating a new flow

Phase: 2
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in   10.10.200.0     255.255.255.0   LANDHCP

Phase: 3
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Implicit Rule
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in  id=0x4273218, priority=2, domain=permit, deny=false
        hits=0, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x3000, protocol=0
        src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Phase: 4
Type: IP-OPTIONS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in  id=0x37f35b0, priority=0, domain=permit-ip-option, deny=true
        hits=37898762, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Phase: 5
Type: INSPECT
Subtype: np-inspect
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in  id=0x37f5180, priority=66, domain=inspect-icmp-error, deny=false
        hits=196678, user_data=0x37f50b0, cs_id=0x0, use_real_addr, flags=0x0, protocol=1
        src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Phase: 6
Type: NAT
Subtype:
Result: DROP
Config:
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  match ip inside any LANDHCP any
    dynamic translation to pool 1 (No matching global)
    translate_hits = 1, untranslate_hits = 0
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in  id=0x42cb620, priority=1, domain=nat, deny=false
        hits=0, user_data=0x426a0e8, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Result:
input-interface: inside
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: LANDHCP
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule

Hello,

You are missing NAT statements between inside and LANDHP. Please configure

identity NAT between the interfaces:

static (inside,LANDHCP) 10.10.220.0 10.10.220.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

static (LANDHCP,inside) 10.10.230.0 10.10.230.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

This should allow communication between the inside and LANDHCP interfaces.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

NT

I am still getting the following, also I cannot ping from a node on the 10.10.220.0 network to 10.10.200.1 which is the interface on the asa.

packet-tracer input inside icmp 10.10.220.101 8 0 10.10.200.1 de$

Phase: 1

Type: FLOW-LOOKUP

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional Information:

Found no matching flow, creating a new flow

Phase: 2

Type: UN-NAT

Subtype: static

Result: ALLOW

Config:

static (LANDHCP,inside) 10.10.200.0 10.10.200.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  match ip LANDHCP 10.10.200.0 255.255.255.0 inside any

    static translation to 10.10.200.0

    translate_hits = 3, untranslate_hits = 34

Additional Information:

NAT divert to egress interface LANDHCP

Untranslate 10.10.200.0/0 to 10.10.200.0/0 using netmask 255.255.255.0

Phase: 3

Type: ACCESS-LIST

Subtype:

Result: DROP

Config:

Implicit Rule

Additional Information:

Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:

in  id=0x3802b20, priority=500, domain=permit, deny=true

        hits=10, user_data=0x6, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0

        src ip=10.10.220.101, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0

        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0

Result:

input-interface: inside

input-status: up

input-line-status: up

output-interface: LANDHCP

output-status: up

output-line-status: up

Action: drop

Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule

edge(config)#

Hello,

First of all, you cannot ping an interface IP from workstations connected to

a different interface. The firewall natively blocks that traffic for

security reasons.

I see from your packet tracer that you are trying to ping 10.10.200.1 IP. I

am not seeing that IP in your configuration (may be I am missing something).

Can you please post your current running configuration here?

Regards,

NT

try nat exemption for traffic from inside to dhcp interface.

There was two issues I had to add nat statements, also I was connecting through the same switch thus creating a loop.

Added nat statements and segmented networks and all works great! 

Thank you to everyone who responded.

Stephen

hallo stephe, how did u solve it, i have the same problem as u had?

Tony

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card