cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
253
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Does packet input ever report the wrong thing?

evan.r.moore
Level 1
Level 1

Hello All.

 

Consider these bits of configuration from my ASA:

 

ASA Version 9.1(3) 
!
hostname wnsk-asa

xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any6
xlate per-session deny tcp any6 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any6 any6
xlate per-session deny udp any4 any4 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any4 any6 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any6 any4 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any6 any6 eq domain

object network callhost-inside
 host 10.3.2.25
object network callhost-outside
 host 209.198.173.58


object-group network EQUINOX
 network-object host 175.146.14.236
 network-object 175.77.48.96 255.255.255.224
 network-object 209.198.187.0 255.255.255.0

access-list inbound12 extended permit tcp object-group EQUINOX host 10.3.2.25 eq 3389 
access-list inbound12 extended permit tcp object-group EQUINOX host 10.3.2.25 eq 5900 
access-list inbound12 extended permit tcp object-group EQUINOX host 10.3.2.25 eq ftp 

access-list awcc_vpn extended permit ip host 10.3.2.25 host 172.31.250.150 


nat (server-lan,itrunk) source static callhost-inside callhost-inside destination static awcc awcc no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network wnsk
 nat (server-lan,itrunk) dynamic WNSK-POOL
object network callhost-inside
 nat (server-lan,itrunk) static callhost-outside
object network vpnpool
 nat (itrunk,itrunk) dynamic WNSK-POOL
access-group inbound12 in interface itrunk

timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout pat-xlate 0:00:30
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00

: end

 

When I check my setup with packet input, I get this:

 

wnsk-asa# packet input itrunk tcp 209.198.187.78 22222   10.3.2.25 3389

Phase: 1
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in   10.3.2.0        255.255.255.0   server-lan

Phase: 2
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype: log
Result: ALLOW
Config:
access-group inbound12 in interface itrunk
access-list inbound12 extended permit tcp object-group EQUINOX host 10.3.2.25 eq 3389 
object-group network EQUINOX
 network-object host 175.146.14.236
 network-object 175.77.48.96 255.255.255.224
 network-object 209.198.187.0 255.255.255.0
Additional Information:

Phase: 3
Type: NAT
Subtype: per-session
Result: ALLOW 
Config:
Additional Information:

Phase: 4
Type: IP-OPTIONS
Subtype: 
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:

Phase: 5
Type: VPN
Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:

Phase: 6
Type: NAT
Subtype: rpf-check
Result: DROP
Config:
object network callhost-inside
 nat (server-lan,itrunk) static callhost-outside
Additional Information:

Result:
input-interface: itrunk
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: server-lan
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule

 

When I actually get on the host at 209.198.187.78 and attempt to connect to port 3389 of 209.198.173.58, it works.  Packet input says it will not work.  What am I getting wrong, or is the ASA tricking me?

 

ERM

 

Bitwrangler for FirstLight Fiber Corp
1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Marvin Rhoads
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

In your packet-tracer string you direct the ASA to tell you about reachability of "10.3.2.25 3389". In your text you mention being able to get to "port 3389 of 209.198.173.58".

Which of those two are you trying to figure out? 

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

Marvin Rhoads
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

In your packet-tracer string you direct the ASA to tell you about reachability of "10.3.2.25 3389". In your text you mention being able to get to "port 3389 of 209.198.173.58".

Which of those two are you trying to figure out? 

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card