08-14-2011 10:44 AM - edited 03-11-2019 02:11 PM
I have a current ASA (5540, 8.3(2)) that is running in routed
mode, doing a VPN endpoint as well as a wirewall for another
inside network. They use the single public IP address
that is on the outside interface, which carries the
default route.
I want to add a NAT configuration to yet another inside
network using a block of outside addresses. I've created
the inside and outside network objects and dynamic NAT between
them. I'm currently using a built-in dhcp server for the
inside nat block.
I've created an inside interface with the network object for the
inside network, which properly assigns a dhcp address. I also
created an outside interface for that network object.
My question is this: Will the outside NATed address traffic egress
from the single outside default route, or will it use the
defined outside interface? I can deal with it either way, but
my upstream router will need a static route for the new outside
range to send the inbound traffic. Or is it possible to use
a routemap? I'm fine with just using the default route if
that is easiest. Do I even need the outside NAT interface?
Another question, is how to direct dhcp requests from the inside
NAT to an external server to overcome the limitations of the
built-in server. (single /24, I need to define a /19 pool)
08-14-2011 12:40 PM
Hi Roger,
I'm not that clear with the first question. The traffic from your inside network will take an interface to exit depending on a lot of checks like NAT, route lookup,etc. So, if the route that you've specified for traffic going out goes like "route outside 0 0
When the reply comes back, the upstream router will send it to the ASA as long as it proxy ARPs for the destination IP address in the reply packet.
For the second question, you can have the ASA be configured for DHCP relay. Here's a link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa83/configuration/guide/dhcp.html#wp1170898
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Anu
P.S. Please mark this question as resolved if it has been answered. Do rate helpful posts.
08-14-2011 06:22 PM
Anu,
Thanks. I think you answered my question, even though I may not have been clear.
I had similar issues (in my head anyway) when I was setting up the vpn terminus.
It seems like I don't need an outside interface for the traffic at all. It will just
use the already defined default outside interface. The upstream router would
have an appropriate static route.
As to DHCP, I do already use it for another inside interface, and the NATed inside
will be using the same server. The server should know which network the request
comes from in the proxy request and provide a response that is appropriate.
One other quick question. If I need to reserve a dozen or so inside addresses from
this same inside network for fixed addresses, can I map these as static as a group,
or will they need to be individual network objects? I can refine the dynamic nat objects
to exclude these addresses.
Roger
08-15-2011 01:21 AM
Hi Roger,
If you need to statically assign addresses one-to-one, then you should use individual network objects. Here's a link that might be useful:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa83/configuration/guide/nat_objects.html#wp1105818
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Anu
P.S. Please mark this question as resolved if it has been answered. Do rate helpful posts.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: