06-28-2014 01:26 PM - edited 03-11-2019 09:23 PM
We have two cisco asa 5510's in a failover setup.
I'd like to take the secondary/failover and make it the primary/active and do this for good..not just for testing. And of course make the other the new secondary/failover.
What would be the best way of doing this? What config do I need to change?
To sum it up, Id like to swap the units from primary to secondary and vice versa.
06-29-2014 03:18 AM
Just issue the command "no failover active" on the primary ASA. The secondary unit will now be the primary/active unit and will remain that way until another failover situation occurs.
--
Please remember to select a correct answer and rate helpful posts
06-30-2014 01:48 AM
09-14-2017 07:21 AM
Primary will be always primary and secondary will be always secondary.., only you can change the Active and standby mode. after putting "failover active" on standby unit, it will become Secondary/Active and other will be primary/Standby.
Regards,
Saurabh
07-17-2019 12:45 PM
Thank you Marius. It was a pretty easy fix.
09-14-2017 08:14 AM
Is you want to change the role and not just the state, you will need to make the failover unit Secondary-Active as others have described. Then take the Primary-Standby offline. Modify the Secondary-Active configuration to designate it as Primary and the (offline) Primary unit to make it Secondary. Then bring the former Primary (newly designated Secondary) back online.
The bigger question is why go the the trouble? The designation is purely cosmetic in 99% of the use cases.
02-22-2018 10:59 PM
02-23-2018 12:54 AM
I suggest you start a new thread and describe what you're trying to accomplish.
07-02-2018 07:08 AM
07-02-2018 08:39 AM
Propagation of configuration changes is always from Active to Standby.
Whether a unit is Primary or Secondary has nothing to do with that bit - it's strictly a convention to distinguish one appliance from the other.
07-30-2018 06:54 AM
I have a similar scenario. The Secondary is Active. The Primary is offline and out of sync with the Secondary. I want to make change my Secondary to Primary, wipe my old Primary and make it Secondary. The process appears easy.
My question is when I change my current Secondary/Active to Primary/Active via:
failover lan unit primary
will this cause any downtime?
11-18-2022 05:06 AM
hi marvin,
i have the same scenario wherein i needed to reverse the primary and secondary role.
when you say take the primary-standby offline, do you mean disable failover/sync using the 'no failover' command?
does it need to be applied on both ASA or just the primary-standby?
can i just straight away reverse role without disabling failover/sync? it's just less than of a second to apply in CLI.
will there be an issue if both secondary-active and primary-standby FW temporarily have the "failover lan unit primary"?
11-18-2022 06:18 AM
@johnlloyd_13 I'm not sure if your suggested method would work. It shouldn't hurt to try but I'd hesitate to do so in production.
My suggestion for taking primary-standby offline was to take it truly offline - disconnect or shutdown its data interfaces. Then modify the secondary-active with the "failover lan unit primary". Similarly modify the offline unit with "failover lan unit secondary". Then bring it back online.
11-18-2022 04:28 PM
hi marvin,
thanks! just to be in the safe side, i will do this in a change window and disable failover between the two before changing/reverse the primary and secondary role.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide