09-05-2008 06:27 AM - edited 03-11-2019 06:40 AM
Hi, I'm having an issue with NAT on a Pix 525 running 6.3.4. I have two IP Address that I'm using a static nat on, one works and one does not.
Here are the static entries
static (inside,vpn) 63.xxx.xxx.37 10.200.100.131 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (inside,vpn) 63.xxx.xxx.38 10.200.199.131 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
The entry for 63.xxx.xxx.37 works fine, .38 will not nat.
pix-525-fw01# show capture fix
9 packets captured
12:01:06.109476 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4184 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 1627796669:1627796669(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:01:09.030363 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4184 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 1627796669:1627796669(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:01:15.065609 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4184 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 1627796669:1627796669(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:04:23.108987 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4208 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 616249661:616249661(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:04:26.082698 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4208 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 616249661:616249661(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:04:32.017378 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4208 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 616249661:616249661(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:20:25.125588 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4330 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 2700232030:2700232030(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:20:28.105051 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4330 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 2700232030:2700232030(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
12:20:34.039701 802.1Q vlan#16 P0 10.200.199.131.4330 > 199.xxx.xxx.242.700: S 2700232030:2700232030(0) win 64512 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,[|tcp]>
9 packets shown
Looking at the xlate table
pix-525-fw01# show xlate | include 10.200.100.131
Global 63.xxx.xxx.37 Local 10.200.100.131
PAT Global 65.xxx.xxx.146(30539) Local 10.200.100.131(62685)
Global 10.200.100.131 Local 10.200.100.131
pix-525-fw01#
pix-525-fw01#
pix-525-fw01# show xlate | include 10.200.199.131
Global 10.200.199.131 Local 10.200.199.131
PAT Global 65.xxx.xxx.146(28971) Local 10.200.199.131(4510)
PAT Global 65.xxx.xxx.146(30551) Local 10.200.199.131(4526)
pix-525-fw01#
The path for both of the sources is the same except the vlan. Has anyone ever seen something like this before?
09-08-2008 08:28 AM
Tried that, got the same result. One works and one does not. Is there a limit or something on static nat's? Is there a debug that I can use to see why it's not being nat'ed?
09-08-2008 07:27 AM
Hi,
Your NAT ip addresses (63.x.x.x) are in different range as your PIX vpn interface ip address .
"ip address vpn 10.200.253.17 255.255.255.248"
can you remove verify reverse-path- "no ip verify reverse-path interface vpn"
and then remove and add those two NAT statement and test.Do clear xlate also.
HTH
Saju
09-08-2008 11:52 AM
Tried that also, got the same result. I'm stumped!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide