03-19-2024 09:58 AM
I am little confused. What is the preferred or best method of restoring a re-imaged FTD (1000 series) that was part of an HA pair? Is it better to run a restore from backup... Or is better to simply configure the device with a barebones config and set up the HA pair again (allowing the primary to push the config.) What is the difference or the pros/cons? Any insight is appreciated. Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-19-2024 10:20 AM
There is a guide that covers both methods:-
IMO, I would configure the barebones config of the management IP address and re-register with the FMC, rather than restore from backup.
03-19-2024 10:20 AM
There is a guide that covers both methods:-
IMO, I would configure the barebones config of the management IP address and re-register with the FMC, rather than restore from backup.
03-22-2024 08:32 AM - edited 03-22-2024 08:33 AM
@Rob Ingram Thank you for your input! Do you know if there are any pros or cons to one method or the other?
03-25-2024 01:06 AM
@brettp well, using the backup/restore method might take slightly longer doing the restore and a subsequent reboot, and the configuration would still be synchronised from the active unit. The other method does not rely on a backup configuration (which would maybe out of date anyway) and has less steps, taking slightly less time to complete.
03-24-2024 04:28 AM
I always prefer to let HA sync the configuration when the device is in an HA pair. This is due because the active device will always sync its configuration to the standby overwriting any existing configuration already there.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide