EIGRP provides a mechanism to load balance over unequal cost paths throungh Variance Command. Variance is a number (1 to 128), multiplied by the local best metric then includes the routes with the lesser or equal metric. The default Variance value is 1, which means equal-cost load balancing.
A condition, Feasibility Condition, must be met for all routes to be installed in routing table via Variance Command.
What is Feasibility Condition?
If, for a destination, a neighbour router advertises a distance that is stricktly lower than our feasible distance, then this neighbour lies on a loop free route to this destination.
Understanding of EIGRP routing protocol
In this document we are trying to understand the feasibility condition and the working of variance command. All routers depcited in the topology diagram are configured with EIGRP routing protocol. The Lo3 address (188.8.131.52/32) is redistributed in EIGRP via redistribute connected command under the EIGRP process.
Router R1 has three paths to the route 184.108.40.206/32
Specifically, we have used different interface selection to provide unequal cost.
With default configuration, the route R1-R2-R3 is chosen over the others as the overall metric of this path is less as compared to that of the paths. Please see the output of the command "show ip route eigrp".
So far so good. Everything is working as expected.
As we desire, EIGRP with load balancing functionality, the route 220.127.116.11/32 should be available with R1 via R4 and R5. We verify the minimum and the maximum cost to reach 18.104.22.168 network from R1 via command "show ip eigrp topology all-links". R1 from its EIGRP topology table is learning the route 22.214.171.124/32 from all the sources but installed the route learned via neighbour R2 in its routing table.
The lowest metric is 435200 (that of path R1-R2-R3) and the maximum 2809856 (that of path R1-R5-R3).
Doing a small calculation to find the variance number, 2809856/435200 = 6.4567. I wil use a variance value of 7. Now 7*435200 = 3046400, routes with metric less than this value should be included.
On configuring command "variance 7" under EIGRP process, the route 126.96.36.199/32 now has two sources, R2 and R4. This can be verified by command "show ip route eigrp" on R1.
The output is not what we desired, the expected result was route 188.8.131.52 to be available from all the three neighbours i.e. R2, R4 and R5. Why the route from R4 was included and the route R5 discarded?
For R1 and R4
If, for a destination (184.108.40.206), a neighbour router (R4) advertises a distance (409600) that is stricktly lower than our feasible distance (435200), then this neighbour lies on a loop free route to this destination.
Metric learned from R4 (2323456) < Metric Calculated via Variance Multiplier (3046400)
For R1 and R5, this condition is not met as R5 advertises a distance 2297856 which is much higher that the feasible distance (435200) on R1.
Note: Even though the overall metric from R5 (2323456) is less than the Metric Calculated via Variance Multiplier (3046400), the route 220.127.116.11 is discarded as it does not meet the Feasibility Condition.
I have a question about route redistribution from OMP to BGP. It appears that routes redistributed from OMP to BGP have their metric set to 1000 and local-pref set to 50. bgp routes-table vpn 201 10.100.106.0/24info 0nexthop 0.0.0.0metric...
Dear Cisco Support,Greeting of the dayi have an issue with the bandwidth. i have a ILL of Reliance JIO 50MBPS. when i checked on laptop direct through line Customer end. i am getting total of 50mbps speed but when is plugging link wan port on router and t...