01-09-2004 09:59 AM - edited 03-02-2019 12:47 PM
Hi, everyone!
I`m using QoS using CBWFQ with Frame-Relay; and if i configure:
!
policy-map QOS-NAME
class VOICE
bandwidth percent 50
XXXX....conf.....XXXXX
class DataPlus
bandwidth percent 25
!
class-map match-all DataPlus
match access-group name DataPlus
!
ip access-list extended DataPlus
XXXX....conf.....XXXXX
permit tcp any any eq bgp
permit tcp any eq bgp any
XXXXXXX
!
I know that BGP updates have a higher precedence even than voice (7 or something like that)..but i`d like to know if this kind of class-map giving certain "preference" overrides the ip prcedence default of the routing updates...
I hope you can help me with this question...
Thanks a lot
Alfonso Resendiz
01-09-2004 10:04 AM
When using CBWFQ you can only define 75 % of the bandwidth. The other 25 % is going to be used for all of the management traffic, such as routing updates, so you do not have to worry about anything getting priority over bgp. Ypu will always be guarenteed up to 25 % for this.
01-09-2004 10:56 PM
Hi msdonahue!
Thanks for your answer, i forgot to tell you, than in this case i´m not using a serial Interface, i´m using a RPM card (MGX8830), using MultiLink and Virtual Template interfaces, and it makes me use the command max-reserved-bandwidth in order to apply the policy to the interfaces...i´m using max-reserved-bandwidth 85, because is the only way the rpm lets me use the policies, with serial interfaces i´ve no problems...
I hope u can answer me again..
thanks!!
01-12-2004 07:29 PM
Hi, guys!
Any update?, i´d like to know if this configuration on a RPM can affect my bgp updates..
Thanks!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide