05-20-2004 05:44 AM - edited 03-02-2019 03:50 PM
HUB1
|
C
A HUB2
T |
5 |<-- Fiber
| |
Switch1 --- Switch4
|
|<-- Fiber
|
Switch2 --CAT5> HUB
|
|<-- Fiber
|
Switch3
|
|<-- Fiber
|
Switch5 (NEW)
In the above illustration:
All switches are connected by fiber.
All switches and hubs are populated with computers
Switch 1 is the main switch
Does adding Switch 5 to Switch3 violate the 5-4-3 rule?
(This would be the most cost effective spot for it)
If so where should it be added?
Thanks for your help.
05-20-2004 06:47 AM
Well I don't know how your design started out this way but what you really need to do is have one of your switches at the top and all other hubs and switches directly connect to that switch via a star formation. Then I would replace your hubs with switches.
Jason Smith
05-20-2004 07:07 AM
I may have illustrated it incorrectly,
it started as a star but 3 was added to 2
because Switch 1 only had 2 fiber ports
Now I either need to add another switch
on top of 1 with fiber, of which nome of
the copper ports are used and add SW5 on
the other end, Or Add 5 directly to 3.
Will adding 5 to 3 work or do I need to
look at an alternative?
Hub1--->| |<---Switch4
Hub2--->|Switch1|<---Switch2<--Switch3(<--SW5?)
06-09-2004 03:04 PM
If you need more fiber connections just buy a couple of copper to fiber media converters, cheaper than buying a whole new switch though it does add another potential point of failure .
08-01-2004 02:15 AM
The 5-4-3 rule does not apply to switched ethernet networks. It applies only to shared-access networks. Please check these links:
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide