VPLS over GRE Tunnel on Cat 9500

[Dovianto S]

Hi all,

i have tested the VPLS over GRE tunnel , the topology like below, but i have the problem when try to ping from CE1 to CE2, my configuration like below, need anyone for help me about this.thank you

CE1 ---Cat 9500-1 ------Cat 9500-2 ---- CE2

[MHM Cisco World]

Can I see config 

[Dovianto S]

Hi NHMm

thanks for your replay..,below my config thanks

[balaji.bandi]

You posted the config only PE to PE how you established connection.

You need to post the configuration - where CE connected interface, that should belong to what VLAN ?

how is your CE configured bot the side - post that configuration also.

refer below guide  :

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst9500/software/release/17-1/configuration_guide/mpls/b_171_mpls_9500_cg/configuring_virtual___private_lan_service__vpls__and_vpls_bgp_based_autodiscovery.html#task_bg5_dr4_jgb

Also refer below thread :

https://community.cisco.com/t5/other-network-architecture-subjects/vpls-over-gre-tunnel/m-p/4862035

[Dovianto S]

Hi bandi,

thanks for you reply  , The configuration on both of  CE only like below and both of  Cat-1 and Cat-2 9500, it's same on Ten1/0/34 and configuration like below;

!
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/34
switchport access vlan 100
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
no cdp enable
spanning-tree portfast

CE:1

router ospf 1

network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area  0

int gi0/1

ip add 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

CE2:

router ospf 1

network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area  0

int gi0/1

ip add 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0

[MHM Cisco World]

Hmm'

That need think

Your CE use dot1q-tunnel which meaning QinQ and VPWS is config.

The issue with mix two.

So let start check 

Remove qinq and check ping 

 Why you not use pseudo class?

I will double check the config of qinq and vpws.

MHM

[Dovianto S]

Hi MHM,

sorry for late respon, i just remove qinq but still can't ping between CE, 

why you not use pseudo call ?

- because on feature  will have more than 2 site, so this is only testing, do we have problem with MTU?