05-09-2005 04:48 AM - edited 03-09-2019 11:11 AM
Hello all, i have one problem in which i need help
We got 2 ISP for traffic separating. I am using PIX 515E with version 6.3(1).
Before i ran on 1 ISP and everything was ok. I had 3 interfaces (inside, outside, dmz). Because PIX not supporting logical interfaces and i didnot want to go in really complicated in troubleshooting logical VLANs biulding, we purchased 4 port 10/100 FE card. On this card 1 interface i defined as outside1 with security1 and ISP2 public IP. This interface sitting in same VLAN with border router interface with ISP2 public IP.
There is route outside1 0 0 router_IP metric 2
I am trying to define static NAT translation for my local IP to ISP2 Public IP. After issueing clear xlate i am see that i still located in PAT for ISP1 public IP.
I have several questions:
1. Is this statement for route outside1 0 0 router_IP_ISP2 metric 2 is correct for PIX?
2. Should i reconfigure exisitng NAT (inside) for 2nd new global (outside1) via separating IP local subnets?
3. When i permitted isakmp and crypto ipsec on outside1 interface i succeded to have remote VPN connections. Can this work together?
Any help will be high appreciated.
Thanks, Alex
05-09-2005 06:19 AM
Alex,
I hope pix 6.3 sipport only single default route so that we can not use load sharing on pix fw.
Pix software 7.x support 3 default routes.
If any thing wrong pl update me
swamy
05-09-2005 08:22 PM
Hi arumigasamy,
Thanks for your reply. May be it will be possible to separate the trafic via 2 globals?
Because for example i succedidng to connect to border router via VLAN?
Thanks
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide