04-04-2001 11:45 PM - edited 03-08-2019 08:08 PM
Can CBAC works on a router that has behind it a firewall running PAT. Or maybe CBAC is not necessary since we have a firewall in place.
04-10-2001 06:55 AM
I think its probably overkill and likely to create more problems than what its worth. Check the integrity of your existing solution. If it meets your security policy and youre happy with its performance and reliability, stick with that. If not, you might want to consider replacing it with the IOS Firewall feature set.
04-11-2001 06:10 PM
This does work, however, keep in mind the load you can put on your router. We have seen performance issues using a 2620 and CBAC. You may want to consider using a 2650 if you do decide to use CBAC and traffic is high.
It may be better if you use an access-list on the border router and let the firewall catch everyting else.
06-01-2001 07:23 PM
CBAC can expose a few unexpected problems. In one case a badly-behaved NT workstation spewed DNS lookups and exceeded the threshhold set for maximum sessions per minute, effectively shutting down the interface. In another case we found old NCD X-terminals using TFTP to boot didn't set up their UDP port numbers correctly, and the "inspect name
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide