04-07-2003 07:32 AM - edited 03-09-2019 02:48 AM
Hi,
I apoligize for my bad english!!
I must do a complex VPN between two pix where I must use NAT. However I have a problem with the NAT. In fact I want to relocate my subnet "10.0.1.0/24" towards a virtual network "20.0.1.0/24" . I will do it with this commands :
Global (outside) 20 20.0.1.0
Nat (inside) 20 access-list 120
with access-list 102 permit ip 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 20.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
But the pix don't want this commands because with an access-list, it accept only nat 0
I like to know how I can circumvent this problem
Thank you in advance,
Paul Martiny
04-07-2003 09:54 AM
If you use ¨Global (outside) 20 20.0.1.0¨, it´s not NAT, It´s PAT, instead you can use,
Global (inside) 20 20.0.1.0 255.x.x.x , Then,
Have you tried....
nat (inside) 20 10.x.x.x 255.x.x.x ???
Hope that helps u.
04-07-2003 10:35 PM
thank you for your advice, but i have already try this, but it doesn't run again.
Thank you anyway
Paul Martiny
04-09-2003 06:52 AM
If you want a one-for-one mapping, why not just use a static:
static (inside,outside) 20.0.1.0 10.0.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide