10-19-2010 02:01 AM - edited 03-01-2019 02:21 PM
Hello,
I have a situation where my customer is using an SCE in its service provider network. However the total concurrent sessions reported is not correlate with other vendor device, example like Juniper firewall. The firewall measured the concurrent sessions is about 8-10 times more than the SCE reported. So is the SCE calculates the concurrent sessions differently?
Thank you.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-19-2010 02:03 PM
A session doesn't have just one definition. In the case of TCP, for example, it is obvious. In case of UDP, a session can be defined by src/dst ip/port and an aging timer. For a SIP flow, a session is what ends with a "BYE".
Note that the SCE is bundling some flows into a single flow, but only for some particular protocols, like SIP, FTP, H323, MGCP,Skinny,... For example, for FTP, SCE will bundle the control and the data session into a single session.
Tom
10-19-2010 05:12 AM
Hello,
What is the command you use to get the number of sessions in the SCE ?
Thomas.
10-19-2010 06:49 AM
Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
I'm actually not familiar with SCE command line and I do not have access to customer's SCE. But they provided a graph which captured the concurrent sessions. For example when it reads 500k on the graph, the other device captured about 3millions sessions at the same time. Kindly refer the attachment.
10-19-2010 07:02 AM
Well I see two possibilities here,
Either the definition of session is different between the SCE and the Juniper FW
Or all the traffic going through the FW is not going through the SCE.
Thomas.
10-19-2010 08:04 AM
Do you know the definition of session for SCE? Does SCE has it's own proprietary formula of measuring the concurrent sessions?
10-19-2010 02:03 PM
A session doesn't have just one definition. In the case of TCP, for example, it is obvious. In case of UDP, a session can be defined by src/dst ip/port and an aging timer. For a SIP flow, a session is what ends with a "BYE".
Note that the SCE is bundling some flows into a single flow, but only for some particular protocols, like SIP, FTP, H323, MGCP,Skinny,... For example, for FTP, SCE will bundle the control and the data session into a single session.
Tom
10-20-2010 02:24 AM
Thank you for your explanation. Do you have the reference for more details
of SCE's flow bundling?
10-20-2010 04:51 AM
I don't have such document, but here is a list which should be complete of protocols for which the SCE is bundling flows:
SIP,H323,MGCP,Skinny,Yahoo VoIP over SIP,ICQ VoIP,FTP,RTSP,MS MMS,Primus,PTT,Winphoria ,TFTP and IRC.
Tom
10-21-2010 06:18 AM
For example, let say an user is browsing a dynamic webpage via http which has multiple connections. So SCE should be able to capture each concurrent sessions rather than just 1 http session by the user, correct? Since http is not in the list where SCE bundles into a single flow/session.
10-21-2010 07:06 AM
Yes, you will for example see a session for Google Analytics, if it is used by the web site.
10-26-2010 02:42 AM
Hi,
How about Cisco IPS42xx? Do both Cisco SCE and Cisco IPS42xx calculate the concurrent sessions the same way?
10-26-2010 02:46 AM
I am not familiar with the IPS42xx, but I doubt so. The aging timer for UDP sessions will probably not be the same and I would be surprised if the IPS is bundling sessions the same way as the SCE.
Tom
04-04-2012 11:39 PM
Active subscribers = introduced + Anonymous
Concurrent Session means the current opened session. (using the internet)
i.e if the active is 8k that does not mean all of them have a current session to the internet. They are just connected but not browsing
The firewall deal with this in different way.
Regards
Aasim
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide