10-10-2012 11:44 AM
Hopefully a simple question. Comcast has indicated that this is required for IPv6 to work, and since it means gatting a /64 address space for my network I am understandably eager to tak advantage of this new functionality when it is available in my area.
Thanks,
Robert Hessenauer
07-23-2013 10:43 PM
Nagaraja,
As it had been several months since my last response I was wondering where Cisco was with this issue. Alternatiely, is there another SMB device (can be wired Gigabit at this point if necessary) that supports both the IPSec site-to-site VPN tunnels AND DHCPv6-PD in its native feature set.
I find it frustrating that the DHCPv6-PD is supported in your consumer line but not in the SMB space where it is more lokely to be used and understood.
Thanks for your response.
Bob Hessenauer
07-23-2013 11:07 PM
Tuska,
Just checking in to see if you had heard of any movement on this issue as well. I am unable to "see" the support case that was opened in response, so I come to you. I know they eventually resolved the issue on the RV042, and would be willing to switch hardware if necesary. I just need the site-to-site VPN feature to support my father's network (he lives in a motor coach) and would like to have the full IPv6 implementation when it becomes available.
Thanks,
Bob Hessenauer
07-24-2013 08:49 AM
No movement on this one that I know of but I will ask about it..
ComcastTuska
Senior Network Engineer, Comcast
IPv6 Project
07-29-2013 09:39 AM
Hello Robert,
At the current time, RV180 does not support the DHCPv6-PD feature. DHCPv6-PD is supported on RV042G and RV32x platforms currently. Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Nagaraja
01-02-2014 08:36 AM
Have there been any updates to this?
09-13-2015 06:59 PM
its incredible... its just a soft missing why not just put the code to dhcp6-pd it? INCREDIBLE!!!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide