02-14-2012 06:48 PM
Is it possible to set up an RV110W to limit access to only specified websites according to a schedule?
I can block access to specific sites using the Internet Access Policy settings under Firewall, but I can't figure out a successful way to block access to all sites except those specified. I also tried establishing access rules but that did not work either.
02-22-2012 03:51 PM
Hello
I have a similar problem with a RV120W.
I want to allow access to five sites and block everything else.
Have you found a solution?
Authorized site needed: WindowsUpdate, antivirus, and a site update for a specific application
See you soon
02-22-2012 06:32 PM
Hi Mark and Matthieu,
Thank you for posting. The Admin Guide describes how to set this up starting on page 88:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv110w/administration/guide/rv110w_admin.pdf
I think that you want to look at Step 5: Always Block, which refers to Step 7.
Please keep us updated and let us know if you have any issues.
10-18-2012 05:17 PM
The Internet Access Policy
worked mediocre for me, It opnly work if I specify the optional client MAC address or IP
BUT it only bliock http pages (port 80), if the client access the blocked site in https (port 443) it allow him to do it.
so I was not able to block Facebook access using the Internet Access Policy
I need to it in the Access Rules, and by this I had to type all the IP address that Facebook use (I just hope they don't add new IP soon)
02-07-2013 07:29 AM
Hello
Not solution for my customer, not good for the business...
Is realy not possible to block access to url type www.facebook.com or ok to access for windowsupdate ?
Because block IP adresse is not possible for the big site and IP adresse change and move.
Is not possible to block or allow with keyword ?
Sorry for my english ;-)
Regard
07-11-2013 11:01 AM
Your message is clear: Blocking by IP address and port are no longer adequate. We need to be able to block by DNS resolved name/range of IPs which means being able to define rules based on names, not IPs. Hopefully this will change, hopefully it is cisco that gets there first.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide