10-29-2012 11:00 PM
Hi ,
At one of our client locations IPSec VPN is established between Cisco RV 220W and Cisco WRVS4400N Routers.
Router /VPN /ISP Details are as given below
Location A | Location B |
---|---|
Internet Details ---------------------- Download : 6-10 Mbps Router Details ---------------------- Cisco RV220W Firmware : 1.0.3.5
Encryption : 3DES VPN Policy Encryption : 3DES | Internet Details ------------------------- Download : 1.35 Mbps
---------------------- Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware version : V2.0.1.3
Encryption : 3DES
Encryption : 3DES |
From the day the VPN was implemented, the performance was poor. Frequent disconnections of live sessions to VPN nodes and very low data transfer rates is been worrying users.
The Servers are in Location A and the users at Location B gets authenticated at DC Server in Location A
Terminal Server remote applications such as Quickbooks, QQ Evolution,Attendance RX are also being used from Location A by users in Location B
The login is time consuming and all the applications are extremely slow.
I tried to copy files between share folders in between two locations and the results are as follows
Location A to Location B -> 130Kbps to 140 Kbps
Location B to Location A -> 150Kbps to 160 kbps
What can be the problem for such poor VPN performance ? .
-Would changing the encryption settings to less secure DES /MD5 have any significant impact as it can reduce the overhead on the Routers ?
-Even though both the routers are SMB routers , it does have really good VPN throughput according to the data sheets. I could not find VPN throughput mentioned in WRVS4400N data sheet. I have also noted from one of the threads in CSC that the VPN throughput of WRVS4400N was mentioned really low as only around 1.6Mbps. (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2107881) Whereas RV220W router has 90Mbps VPN throughput , according to the data sheet.
So what can be the exact cause of the issue and what can be the possible fixes?
Please help !
Anup Sasikumar
Newbie to Cisco VPN Router, please help
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-04-2012 06:56 AM
RVS4000 was designed to operate in a small office. It supports 5 VPN tunnels with a maxium of 2 Mpbs throughput measured in a labs environment. It has a processor that has an integrated IPS engine, which could deliver 20 Mbps LAN-WAN throughput when IPS is enabled.
RV220W was deisgned to operate in a slightly bigger office with 25 IPsec VPN tunnels. It has a processor that has an integrated crypto engine that can deliver 90 Mbps of IPsec throughput. RV220W also supports 5 SSL VPN tunnels that can be used by employees or business partners for remote access.
10-29-2012 11:15 PM
Judging from your location B details, I would say you're fortunate. 160 kbps is 1.31 mbit. That means the tunnel isn't penalizing your transfer rates. You can only operate at the fastest link.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts
11-04-2012 05:05 AM
Oh, Yes Yes. Thanks for pointing out. We are indeed getting the maximum available speed from the link right ? So I guess , upgrading the link speed at location B would provide better performance.
I have seen posts saying the maximum VPN throughput of Cisco WRVS 4400N is only around 1.6 Mbps. Is it so ? I could not find any reference to VPN throughput details in the specs / datasheets.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
11-04-2012 06:56 AM
RVS4000 was designed to operate in a small office. It supports 5 VPN tunnels with a maxium of 2 Mpbs throughput measured in a labs environment. It has a processor that has an integrated IPS engine, which could deliver 20 Mbps LAN-WAN throughput when IPS is enabled.
RV220W was deisgned to operate in a slightly bigger office with 25 IPsec VPN tunnels. It has a processor that has an integrated crypto engine that can deliver 90 Mbps of IPsec throughput. RV220W also supports 5 SSL VPN tunnels that can be used by employees or business partners for remote access.
11-04-2012 09:37 AM
Hi Tekliu,
Thank you for providing the detailed information !
Is WRVS4400N Router in the same family as that of RVS4000 you mentioned ?
Regards,
Anup
11-04-2012 10:41 AM
Yes, RVS4000 and WRVS4400N are in the same family.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide