Are these NAT commands correct?

[isaiahhavoc]

I'm a bit of a tyro when it comes to NAT configuration...

This is my topology

This is what I'm trying to accomplish

Step 1:Let all “hosts” on inside network be allowed to be translated for NAT and use outside interface for public address.

Step 2:Create a static NAT for your DMZ server at 172.16.P.2. Use the “globaladdress” of192.168.P.100 Where P is your respective Pod Number (either 1 or 2)

Step 3:Create a static NAT for your inside server at 10.0.P.11. Use the “globaladdress” of192.168.P.150 Where P is your respective Pod Number (again either 1 or 2)

I did the commands

1) object network inside
subnet 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside, outside) dynamic interface

2)object network insideserver
host (iphere)
nat (inside, outside) static 192.16.2.150

(and repeated for dmz server)

Does this look right? Trying to verify before I continue. Thanks everyone. :)

[paul driver]

Hello
This is a class room project correct?
Is the router in the middle classed as the public router, if so by the looks of it that router and ASA P/Q are sharing the same subnet or is this typo in the topology you've posted?

This 192.168.P..x Is this a subnet you wish to use for you inside global addressing?