07-29-2009 07:56 AM - edited 03-04-2019 05:35 AM
Hello
We are a small ISP with links from two larger upstreams.
Take for example , I am advertising 192.168.52.0 / 22 IP Block through ISP1. For this I am putting a Null0 route " ip route 192.168.52.0 255.255.252.0 Null0 " . One of the router's interface is assigned with the IP address 192.168.52.1 /22 - whole customer network is running through that interface.So far so good.
Now I want to introduce ISP2 & advertise only 192.168.52.0/24 IP Block through ISP2. This I cant - the Block is not getting advertised unless and until I add the route " ip route 192.168.52.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 " & as soon as I add this route the interface on which the IP address 192.168.52.1 /22 is assigned stops pinging- and it is turning to a mess.
Any suggestion to how to advertise only the 192.168.52.0/24 block through ISP2 .
Please revert if any clarification is needed.
Abhishek
07-30-2009 09:44 AM
I understand that part but if there is already a ip route in there for the /22 would not the prefix list then use the /24 because of the le 24 at the end of it?
07-30-2009 09:46 AM
Rick
I may be misunderstanding what you are getting at but it must be an exact match ie. the network and the subnet mask before it can be advertised.
Jon
07-30-2009 09:47 AM
Jon
And that is why I suggested that he not use a null 0 static route but use a static route specifying the outbound interface with the specific prefix and subnet mask that he wants.
Something like this:
ip route 192.168.52.0 255.255.255.0 gig0/12
HTH
Rick
07-30-2009 11:24 AM
Rick Burts
"And that is why I suggested that he not use a null 0 static route but use a static route specifying the outbound interface with the specific prefix and subnet mask that he wants."
Yes i realise that. I totally agree with you.
Think you mistook my last post to Rick ie the other Rick (engagerocks), as addressed to you :-).
Jon
07-31-2009 03:55 AM
Jon
My apologies. You are correct that I did not realize that there were 2 Rick active in the thread. Thanks for helping me realize this. Your comment to the other Rick now makes sense.
HTH
Rick
07-30-2009 09:58 AM
I stand corrected.
I was thinking in reference to permitting and or denying incoming traffic on specific announcements using the le command.
Sorry to muddy up the water
07-30-2009 04:08 PM
Jon/Rick B.
Perhaps my understanding of BGP inject map is wrong but isn't that can be used in this case as you already have aggregate route and you want to inject more specific route?
07-30-2009 11:25 PM
Yagnesh -
I have checked BGP Inject Maps with cisco docs- it may be possible by inject-maps , but the feature is available only with some specific hardaware/software platforms.I need to depend upon traditional methods available.
All-
Lets do it & monitor it for sometime. I will update you with feedbacks.
Abhishek
07-31-2009 03:54 AM
Yagnesh
I've never used this feature but from the looks of it your understanding is perfectly correct, this would indeed be another solution to the same problem.
Jon
08-04-2009 07:22 AM
All-
The settings are working ok , it is running for the last 3-4 days I have not registered any problems.
Thanks to all.
Abhishek
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide