04-28-2023
06:30 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:05 PM
by
Translator
Hello,
I have 3 routers that use BGP (Internal/External) + EIGRP for IGP.
Here is the quick configuration of routers :
-- R1 (fd12:3456:789a:1::1)
ipv6 route ::/0 Null0
router bgp 100
address-family ipv6
network ::/0
R1#sh ipv6 route ::/0
Routing entry for ::/0
Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
Backup from "eigrp 10 [170]"
Route count is 1/1, share count 0
Routing paths:
directly connected via Null0
Last updated 1w0d ago
-- R2 (fd12:3456:789a:1::2)
ipv6 route ::/0 Null0
router bgp 100
address-family ipv6
network ::/0
R2#sh ipv6 route ::/0
Routing entry for ::/0
Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
Backup from "eigrp 10 [170]"
Route count is 1/1, share count 0
Routing paths:
directly connected via Null0
Last updated 1w0d ago
-- R3 (fd12:3456:789a:1::3)
ipv6 route ::/0 Null0
router bgp 100
address-family ipv6
network ::/0
R3#sh ipv6 route ::/0
Routing entry for ::/0
Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
Backup from "bgp 100 [200]"
Route count is 1/1, share count 0
Routing paths:
directly connected via Null0
Last updated 2d01h ago
R3#sh bgp ipv6 uni rib-failure
Network Next Hop RIB-failure RIB-NH Matches
::/0 fd12:3456:789a:1::1
IPv6 Higher admin distanc n/a
Only one router the R3 has a rib-failure. The difference compared to R1 and R2 is that it knows ::/0 by BGP instead of EIGRP like the others.
I don't understand why because the configuration of the 3 routers is identical
An idea ?
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-29-2023
08:06 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:24 PM
by
Translator
Hi @sebastien3 ,
The state on R3 is actually the proper state. You should see the same on R1 and R2 as well. Do a
clear ipv6 route ::/0
on both R1 and R2. This should remove the backup from eigrp on R1 and R2.
04-28-2023 06:35 AM - edited 04-28-2023 07:07 AM
the backup is from iBGP, the BGP if find the same prefix learn from better IGP path it not inject to RIB.
04-28-2023
07:09 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:09 PM
by
Translator
Good thing about this type of failure is that it tells you why
Higher admin distanc in show ip bgp
is this why ? Backup from "bgp 100 [200]" vs. Backup from "eigrp 10 [170]"
04-28-2023
07:12 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:10 PM
by
Translator
Yes but why is it only R3 which has this behavior ?
R3 does not receive ::/0 from eBGP...
sh bgp ipv6 uni neighbors XXXX:X:X:X::X:1 received-routes | inc ::/0
04-28-2023
07:14 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:11 PM
by
Translator
can I see
show ip bgp
for three routers ?
04-28-2023
07:24 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:12 PM
by
Translator
R1#sh bgp ipv6 uni
BGP table version is 451614532, local router ID is 10.0.0.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter,
x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed,
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i ::/0 fd12:3456:789a:1::2
12800 100 0 i
*> :: 0 32768 i
R2#sh bgp ipv6 uni
BGP table version is 236579704, local router ID is 10.0.0.2
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter,
x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed,
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i ::/0 fd12:3456:789a:1::1
0 100 0 i
* :: 0 32768 i
*> FE80::CE16:7EFF:FEAA:5B94
12800 32768 i
R3#sh bgp ipv6 uni
BGP table version is 7109274, local router ID is 10.0.0.3
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter,
x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed,
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
r>i ::/0 fd12:3456:789a:1::1
0 100 0 i
r i fd12:3456:789a:1::2
12800 100 0 i
04-28-2023 07:34 AM
I think there is suboptimal loop here but I need to more check the Case.
04-28-2023 07:45 AM
OK if need something please tell me.
04-28-2023 07:48 AM
NO It easy three routers each config with default route toward Null0 and there is EIGRP connect the three routers,
I will check if there is multi redistribution in some point and see it effect if it same as your or not.
04-28-2023
08:05 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:12 PM
by
Translator
Only one thing I need
Clear ip bgp 100
and then check again.
04-28-2023
07:40 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:13 PM
by
Translator
Hi @sebastien3 ,
it looks like R3 is the only router that does not originate the default route via BGP.
R3#sh bgp ipv6 uni
...
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
r>i ::/0 fd12:3456:789a:1::1 0 100 0 i
This explains why you see the RIB failure on R3.
Can you provide the
show bgp ipv6 uni ::/0
output from R3.
Regards,
04-28-2023
08:03 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:14 PM
by
Translator
@MHM Cisco WorldOK !
R3#show bgp ipv6 uni ::/0
BGP routing table entry for ::/0, version 4776991
Paths: (2 available, best #1, table default, RIB-failure(145))
Not advertised to any peer
Refresh Epoch 2
Local, (received & used)
fd12:3456:789a:1::1 from fd12:3456:789a:1::1 (10.0.0.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0
Refresh Epoch 2
Local, (received & used)
fd12:3456:789a:1::2 from fd12:3456:789a:1::2 (10.0.0.2)
Origin IGP, metric 12800, localpref 100, valid, internal
rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0
04-28-2023 08:10 AM
Hi @sebastien3 ,
That confirms that R3 does not originate the default route, despite the original configuration you posted. This is definitely why you are seeing the RIB failure only on R3. Make sure the network statement (network ::/0) is configured on R3.
Regards,
04-28-2023
08:23 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:15 PM
by
Translator
clear bgp ipv6 unicast
on R3 does not change anything I still have RIB-Failure
@Harold Ritter: I have network::/0 in the BGP configuration...
04-28-2023
08:40 AM
- last edited on
05-14-2023
10:21 PM
by
Translator
It is not normal that you have a network statement for ::/0 and a static route to null0 for the same prefix and yet R3 is not originating the ::/0. Could you please provide the
show runn | sec router bgp
output from R3?
You might want to try removing the network statement and re-apply it.
Regards,
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide