Buy router RV130 for multiple public IP

[ComoLeo526168]

We have changed to another Internet line to other one which have 4 public ip available on same ISP.

For old Internet line, ISP used Mitrotik RB750GL router and they didn't provide rental router for new line now. So we use an old Asus wireless router (year 2014) for these public ip temporary.

ISP provides two groups of public IP. They told us to setup below.

One group is for our router WAN.

Another group is for our router LAN and disable DHCP on our router.

Our devices include firewall, ipcam. Just input public IP in the device directly. And it works finally.

Since Cisco RV130 VPN Giga Router is cheaper, we would like to buy it to replace our old Asus wireless router.

I check that RV130 has one-to-one NAT. For our case, we don’t need this function.

One-to-One Network Address Translation (NAT) on RV130 and RV130W VPN Routers

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/smb/routers/cisco-rv-series-small-business-routers/smb5056-one-to-one-network-address-translation-nat-on-rv130-and-rv13.html

.

Can Cisco RV130 do the same purpose as our requirement? Is Cisco RV130 suitable for our case? And we don't need to use vpn etc.

Please advise.

[Giuseppe Larosa · Accepted solution]

Hello ComoLeo526168,

the RV130 is good to support a single Internet WAN link and to be a substitute for the ASUS router.

You can find the RV130 admin guide on the following link

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/routers/csbr/rv130w/admin_guide/en/rv130w_admin_en.pdf

If you don't need NAT or VPN it is just enough to do not configure them or disable them

Be aware also of the firewall feature that you may need to tune,

If you want to have a single router to manage two different WAN links you should go for an higher model like RV250.

But for a single Internet connection with no NAT and no VPN the RV130 should be enough.

Hope to help

Giuseppe