06-04-2022
05:24 AM
- last edited on
06-04-2022
07:26 AM
by
Translator
Lab I am doing has the instructors set up the addressing on the links between the transit routers
However they gave appendix on how to set it up
the appendix on the bottom says Tr1 and Tr2 are very similar
https://nsrc.org/workshops/2019/mnnog1/riso/networking/routing-security/en/labs/ebgp.html
basically on TR2 f1/1 interface this is the commands
TR2 Router
description Link to TR2 (and to the world)
ip address 100.121.0.0 255.255.255.254 secondary
ip address 10.10.0.235 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address 2001:18::/127
ipv6 address 2001:DB8:100::235/64
and so I just modified it a little bit for the addressing on TR1 router
TR1 Router
interface f1/1
description Link to TR2 (and to the world)
ip address 100.121.0.1 255.255.255.254 secondary
ip address 10.10.0.236 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address 2001:18::1/127
ipv6 address 2001:DB8:100::236/64
IIt's pinging fine
I'm asking for opinions if there's any potential dangers in the way I've addressed or anything I can improve on
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-04-2022 05:49 AM
06-04-2022 05:37 AM
Addressing looks fine but it is not clear why you need two sets of IPv4 and IPv6 addressing per interface.
Jon
06-04-2022 06:12 AM
I removed some on the interfaces pointed to the AS from the transit routers, I'm still playing with it
06-04-2022 05:49 AM
Hi
No danger and if it is ping fine, you did it right.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide