11-05-2015 04:32 PM - edited 03-05-2019 02:41 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-05-2015 04:45 PM
Your modem would need routes back to the subnets and NAT setup for those subnets.
However an alternative way of doing it is to NAT all src IPs to the gi0/1 interface IP which it looks like you may be trying to do.
If you are then -
1) you need to add "ip nat inside" to each subinterface
2) the acl for your NAT is only referencing 192.168.1.x clients whereas your other acls reference all subnets.
If you want to have all subnets access the internet change the NAT statement to reference one of the other acls
3) not sure what you are doing with "ip default-network 192.168.1.0" statement.
Just remove it and use the default route you have in your configuration and you don't need to add an AD at the end.
Jon
11-05-2015 04:45 PM
Your modem would need routes back to the subnets and NAT setup for those subnets.
However an alternative way of doing it is to NAT all src IPs to the gi0/1 interface IP which it looks like you may be trying to do.
If you are then -
1) you need to add "ip nat inside" to each subinterface
2) the acl for your NAT is only referencing 192.168.1.x clients whereas your other acls reference all subnets.
If you want to have all subnets access the internet change the NAT statement to reference one of the other acls
3) not sure what you are doing with "ip default-network 192.168.1.0" statement.
Just remove it and use the default route you have in your configuration and you don't need to add an AD at the end.
Jon
11-05-2015 05:28 PM
Thanks Jon. That was it. I didn't have the "ip nat inside" on all of the sub interfaces. I didn't get around to adding the acls yet as I was trying the native first. I appreciate you quick response.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide