02-01-2021 04:47 AM
llo,
I am looking for assistance with an issue that is causing downtime to site, any help would be much appreciated!
We had a previous configuration for a layer 2 10 mbps circuit between sites which worked
A END London 3850 switch
B END London 2921 router
Previous workig Configuration for the 10mbps circuit
A END -
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/10
description WAN (Remote Branch) R1.CF Gi0/0 Chesterfield Virgin 10Mb/s #CAL0065214 (via X-Connect Acc14 Gi3/39)
switchport trunk allowed vlan 410,411,414
switchport mode trunk
bandwidth 10000
no cdp enable
B END -
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description WAN BCR1.GR Gi2/18 | Goswell Rd DC VMB 10Mb/s ID:CAL0065214
mtu 9000
no ip address
duplex full
speed 10
rj45-auto-detect-polarity disable
no cdp enable
service-policy output PM-QOS-WAN
We have ordered an upgraded 100mbps circuit and cutover to this new circuit last week using same config on interfaces at both ends, but we have been advised to set full duplex and speed 100 at both ends of link, which has been done. Our equipment at both ends shows up and up between us and the provider equipment. We cannot however pass traffic between both ends since cutover. The provider had a couple of issues, but now tell us an end to end test has passed.
Our new port config is thus:-
A End
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11
description ***NEW COGENT CIRCUIT via VM *** CHESTERFIELD 100Mb/s (VM Ref:CAL0353583)
switchport trunk allowed vlan 410,411,414
switchport mode trunk
bandwidth 100000
speed 100
duplex full
no cdp enable
B END
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description WAN BCR1.GR Gi2/18 | Goswell Road London
mtu 9000
no ip address
duplex full
speed 100
no cdp enable
service-policy output PM-QOS-WAN
end
I can see that there is a rj45-auto-detect-polarity disable, which I cannot reapply to the B end 2921 router. Would this have any bearing on the issue.
Any help in understanding why this new 100 mbps circuit will not come up is gratefully received.
Thankyou
Stephanie
02-01-2021 05:07 AM
can you post from each device to look. ( what you see in the logs ?)
show interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11
show interface GigabitEthernet0/0
show cdp neigh
02-01-2021 08:28 AM
02-01-2021 08:42 AM
The A 3850 clearly has configured a trunk carrying 3 non default vlans. We have not seen anything on the B 2921 that shows processing of 3 vlans. So it is hard to know if there is some issue about this.
Based on the very limited information available so far my best guess about the issue is that the original 10 mbps circuit was configured by the provider to handle tagged frame. I am guessing that the new 100 mbps circuit is not configured to handle tagged frames. Can you check with the provider about this?
02-01-2021 08:55 AM
02-01-2021 08:44 AM
Orginal post you mentioned :
A END London 3850 switch
B END London 2921 router
as per CDP neighbour it show as below : ( I have good experience with Providers around UK, some time they connect to different company routers or devices )- so i want to clarify is this correct ? if this L2 Circuits you should see your device not others )
R1.XX#sh cdp neigh
Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port ID
SW01.CF.ngl.local
Gig 0/1 132 S I WS-C3560- Gig 0/1 ( Device and port information also not correct)
02-01-2021 08:51 AM
02-01-2021 09:03 AM
thanks for the clarifiation. Do you have high level diagram, how these connected. ?
02-01-2021 01:20 PM
See diagram attached , I hope this helps.
To clarify, we have decided to go with a new single provider for all our circuits. This is the first circuit that we are attempting to cutover from our old provider to an upgraded circuit via our new our 3rd party provider which then goes via Virgin Media to our equipment at the remote end.
The remote site was previously connected to a 10 mbps circuit with VM direct. The text in blue on the diagram, shows what the setting was previously when the circuit worked.
02-01-2021 01:44 PM
thank you for the input, so before the provider, VM direct with 10MB worked, but 100MB is with a new provider is not working, using the same infrastructure.
if the new provider uses the same facilities and the same network, is there any change in the path of the MPLS network?
is this Layer 2 Circuit?
If this is Layer 2, quick test connect both the Side Laptops give IP address p2p and see if that works? before further going to investigate to save your time.
02-01-2021 05:13 AM
Hello,
as far as I recall, the 'rj45-auto-detect-polarity disable' interface command is very old and for 10Mbps links only. It is not even available for higher speed links, so I wouldn't worry about that.
Are the interfaces up/down, or down/down ?
Try the interface command 'mdix auto'.
02-01-2021 08:34 AM
Thanks for your reply.... I did respond earlier, but it didnt get through first time
I suspected the rj45-auto-detect statement might only apply to 10Mbs as there was only one article I could find for that statement and it referred to a 10mb circuit.
Between our equipment and provider supplied equipment at both ends of this link , Each interface is up >>> Line protocol is up
thankyou for your help
02-01-2021 09:01 AM
Hello,
I agree with Richard, if you have a switch trunk terminated on a router, typically there are dot1q subinterfaces. So I wonder how the old circuit worked.
Either way, the mtu on both interfaces is set to 9000, you could try and set that to 1500.
What service/connection do you have from Cogent, what do they call it ?
02-01-2021 09:15 AM
Hi,
I have tried changing MTU setting.
There are subinterfaces on router 2921 at B-end.
Cogent information for the circuit:
The proposal was for EPL - Ethernet private line service
Features: Ethernet HAndoff (electrical /optical)
Private and secure
Full speed Lan Extension
VLAN -based Connectivity
QinQ/Jumbo Frames
02-01-2021 01:33 PM
Hello,
post the full running configurations of both ends.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide