01-30-2015 12:35 AM - edited 03-05-2019 12:41 AM
Hi to all.
I have lots of qinq channels to our remote sites. Channels are provided by our ISP by separate links from ISPs switch to our switch, without second tag (s-vlan). Now, we are going to migrate all our channels to one 10G interface, and provider will give us our channels with double tag (s-vlan + c-vlan).
All management interfaces on switches (SVIs) are in c-vlans. Regarding that i have a question: how can I globally configure sub interface for management (on Cisco ASR1004), for all c-vlans, from different s-vlans?
Here is attached topology, what will be after migrating to one 10G link with ISP.
P.S. Sorry for my terrible english :(
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-03-2015 06:28 AM
heh. i think this is not possible (symmetric) because how router would choose right first vlan tag for outgoing traffic?
so create service instance for each s-vlan and bridge it to BDI.
01-30-2015 09:11 PM
hello. try this.
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/0
no ip address
service instance 2215 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q any second-dot1q 20
rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symm
bridge-domain 2215
!
end
and then create interface bdi2215.
02-02-2015 12:00 AM
Hi! But there is no "encapsulation" command at all (((
02-02-2015 12:50 AM
I have it.
Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 03.10.01.S - Extended Support Release
Cisco IOS Software, ASR1000 Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.3(3)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
02-03-2015 06:01 AM
Hi! I've upgraded IOS Software, and tried configure interface as proposed above, but no success ( Rewrite change is not logically valid on ServInst 2215(Gi1/1/0)), u cannot configure to poping out tags with range of s-vlans or c-vlans... only push
I've tried to push top and inner tags - also no success. Can't understand, what's wrong in my configuration?
RT:
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/0
description TEST1
mtu 1536
no ip address
negotiation auto
no mop enabled
service instance 11 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 1-4094 second-dot1q 11
rewrite ingress tag push dot1q 11 second-dot1q 11 symmetric
bridge-domain 11
interface BDI11
mtu 1536
ip address 10.101.8.254 255.255.255.0
encapsulation dot1Q 11 second-dot1q 11
SW:
Link to customer switch:
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
description trunk:
switchport access vlan 4000
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
no cdp enable
end
Link to RT:
interface GigabitEthernet2/23
description TRUNK: TEST1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2-4094
switchport mode trunk
02-03-2015 06:28 AM
heh. i think this is not possible (symmetric) because how router would choose right first vlan tag for outgoing traffic?
so create service instance for each s-vlan and bridge it to BDI.
02-03-2015 08:15 AM
does it affect to cpu utilization?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide