01-06-2021 04:36 AM
Hello everybody.
I’m reading this documents about Configure VRF Route Leak on Cisco Nexus Switches: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ios-nx-os-software/nx-os-software/213908-configure-vrf-route-leak-on-nexus.html#anc7
I’m aware of the general concept. However I’m not understading why after the redistribution from EIGRP to BGP, in the BGP Table the next-hop it’s itself: 0.0.0.0
It should not be the next-hop received from EIGRP (In the article 10.1.2.2)?
Indeed the metric it’s right.
Thanks a lot and have you a nice day.
Americo
01-06-2021 04:41 AM
Not sure how it was configured, you need to share the config and outputs for us to understand the advise what we can
=====Preenayamo Vasudevam=====
***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****
01-06-2021 04:46 AM
Hello Balaji, first of all thanks for your reply.
No, I’m not configuring it yet, I’m only reading the Cisco article linked above and thinking about it: why report itself as next-hop.
Americo
01-06-2021 05:27 AM - edited 01-06-2021 05:28 AM
its BGP vpnv4 route - so it will look for RD or RT to reach.
more explanation can be find here on video : (this is MPLS, but it similar with VRF)
https://ccieblog.co.uk/mpls/mpls-vpn-2
=====Preenayamo Vasudevam=====
***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide