12-21-2009 07:53 PM - edited 03-04-2019 07:02 AM
I am having a problem routing ip traffic with port numbers from one LAN to another.
I have two networks 192.168 and 10.100. I can successfully connect to devices from the 192 network to the 10 network and from the 10 network to the 192 network. I am also able to access the internet via a proxy sitting on the 192 network from the 10 network.
My problem is that when I try to connect to an IP using s specific port number (for example FTP). I am unable to connect from the 10 network to an ftp server on the 192 network. I am also unable to connect from the 10 network to an FTP server on the internet.
To complicate matters I am unble to determine the route the ftp traffic is going (from the 1 network). I have plaed wireshark on the 10 network and the 192 network and see the packets leaving the workstatiion but not being ACKnowledged. I also do not see the traffic being received on the 192 network.
I have run several debug commands on the router (for IP packets, access-lists, NAT etc) but do not see this traffic on the router. I enabled IP accounting and still do not see the (FTP) traffic).
I included the config for your review.
Can anyone tell me what other commands (debug or other) I can use on the router to 'find' this traffic so I can determine where it is going soI can resolve the issue?
Thanks,
Kerry
12-21-2009 09:37 PM
in your config you r defining acl 127 and 128 under g0/1/0 but these acl r not defined! r they missing or what?
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0
Desc 2nd LAN
ip address 10.100.0.1 255.255.128.0
ip access-group 128 in
ip access-group 127 out
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip accounting output-packets
ip accounting access-violations
ip nat inside
negotiation auto
also we need what is the exact test you made: source ip ? destination ip? tool to make the test (telnet, software,...)
12-23-2009 04:57 AM
As an additional test and to make sure an ACL wasn't stopping traffic I created these two ACLs but did not define them. I did this to pass all traffic.
(creating an ACL that isn't defined will pass ALL traffic).
Also the tests I am using from the 10 network to the 192 network and from the 10 network to the internet are as follows:
1. FTP - ftpzilla - source ip: 10.100.45.32 dest. ip: 192.168.1.5
source ip: 10.100.45.32 dest. ip: ftp.windstream.net
2. iStation test software - source ip 10.100.45.32 dest. ip / port: app2.istation.com / 12500
12-23-2009 07:57 AM
Take all IP access-groups statment's of each interface and try the FTP again. If it still doesn't work source an FTP from the Router interface closest to the FTP Server.
telnet x.x.x.x 21 /source-interface interface
James
01-05-2010 07:44 AM
Removed ACLs from all interfaces,here are the results:
- FTP From 10 network to 192 network - works
- FTP from 10 network to ftp site on internet - does not work
- FTP from router (using 10 as source) to ftp site on 192 - does not work
- FTP from router (using 192 as source) to ftp site on 192 - works
- FTP from router (using 10 as source) to ftp site on internet - does not work
- FTP from router (using 192 as source) to ftp site on internet - does not work
01-05-2010 08:39 AM
Add the 10 network to ACL 10.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide