08-10-2020 06:16 PM - edited 08-10-2020 09:13 PM
Hi Guys, Would like to ask for experts advise what are the Disadvantage of implementing Multiple iBGP neighborship in same subnet like flat network? Let's say 4 iBGP routers that are all connected in a switch and routers iBGP neighborship interfaces are in same subnet. Compare to using common point-to-point connection each or using route-reflector for mesh connection. TIA
08-11-2020 06:44 AM
Hello rueltabarangao@gmail.com ,
clearly from your network diagram there is a single point of falure that is the LAN switch where every router connects to.
This is the main issue of the proposed topology.
In the past service providers POP (Point of Presence) solved this issue using two indipendent LAN switches and two different VLANs/IP subnets to have the required fault tolerance.
iBGP sessions at that point should be terminated on the loopback interfaces so that if at least one LAN interface is alive the router is reachable.
Using Route Reflector servers is compatible with this topology and allows to solve the full mesh requirement of iBGP sessions caused by iBGP split horizon rule.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
08-11-2020 11:12 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide