06-20-2019 03:58 AM
I just apply distribute-lst out on the EIGRP 100 domain and also redistribute eigrp 100 network into Rip domain.
I noticed that my 1.1.1.1 network was blocked inside EIGRP 100 domain but it was redistributed into Rip domain.
is it default behavior ?
R1
router eigrp 100
distribute-list 2 out
network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
network 40.40.40.0 0.0.0.255
redistribute rip metric 1500 1 1 1 1500 route-map TAGG
!
router rip
version 2
redistribute eigrp 100 metric 5
network 20.0.0.0
network 30.0.0.0
!
access-list 2 deny 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 permit any
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-20-2019 04:38 AM
Hello libra_ali786,
the behaviour is correct as the distribute-list is applied outbound in EIGRP meaning it will avoid the EIGRP route for denied prefix 1.1.1.0/24 to be advertised out in EIGRP.
You then redistribute EIGRP into RIP with no route filters and so the EIGRP route to 1.1.1.0/24 that is installed in the IP routing table is redistributed into RIP and RIP will advertise it.
The key point is that EIGRP route for 1.1.1.0/24 is still in the local IP routing table and for this reason it is redistributed into RIP.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-20-2019 04:38 AM
Hello libra_ali786,
the behaviour is correct as the distribute-list is applied outbound in EIGRP meaning it will avoid the EIGRP route for denied prefix 1.1.1.0/24 to be advertised out in EIGRP.
You then redistribute EIGRP into RIP with no route filters and so the EIGRP route to 1.1.1.0/24 that is installed in the IP routing table is redistributed into RIP and RIP will advertise it.
The key point is that EIGRP route for 1.1.1.0/24 is still in the local IP routing table and for this reason it is redistributed into RIP.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-20-2019 05:11 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide