cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1559
Views
2
Helpful
16
Replies

DMVPN phase2 and OSPF design question

ColForbin
Level 1
Level 1

Apologies in advance for the crude drawing

There's an original setup where the green dmvpn did not exist, R1 is the home office R2/R3 are remote offices with substantial bandwidth to the home office, R4/R5 routed everything to R2/R3 over a GRE tunnel.  Everything was area 0, so all those Gig interfaces are pictured that way as they all contained the config ip ospf 1 area 0.

There's a new requirement, leaving that existing working config, but add a GRE tunnel from R4/R5 directly back to R1.  A phase 2 dmvpn was setup, the source on the hub router R1 is the loopback, R4 and R5 tunnels come up no issue.

OSPF.  R1/R4/R5 ip ospf network broadcast, priority on R4/R5 is set to 0.  R1/R4/R5 tunnel interfaces: ip ospf 1 area 1 so that *only* the 3 tunnel interfaces are area 1, everything else is left at area 0...is this good practice?  Or is there a better solution?  For instance, should all of the networks on R4/R5 be moved to area 1?

Keeping in mind all of those interfaces pictured are what's in play in production, point to point between routers, but the environment is just 5 routers in total so it's not enormous, but the other interfaces hanging off R1 and R4/R5 are local subnets for those offices.

Thanks in advance.

 

16 Replies 16

ColForbin
Level 1
Level 1

Just to sum up, most if not all the issues related to a not so carefully designed ospf layout.  Shutting down ospf an starting from scratch with static routes proved out the dmvpn config was valid and working....

most if not all the issues related to a not so carefully designed ospf layout.

Path selection, very likely, I suspect.

Flapping, hmm, I suspect something else.