ā07-09-2012 02:30 PM - edited ā03-04-2019 04:55 PM
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to build a frame-relay multiplink PPP on more than one interface. In other words, could we aggregate two serial port and build a single bundle of frame-relay multilink PPP and keep the same map-class frame-relay SHAPE_384K using the following configuration.
I would also like to understand why the following configuration creates virtual-Template and Virtual-access interfaces:
show ip int brief
Virtual-Access1 177.1.101.1 YES TFTP up up
Virtual-Template1 177.1.101.1 YES TFTP down down
Thanks for your help
Stephane
Configuration
class-map match-all VOICE
match ip dscp ef
class-map match-all SIGNALING
match ip dscp cs3
!
policy-map CBWFQ
class VOICE
priority 48
class SIGNALING
bandwidth 8
class class-default
fair-queue
!
interface Serial1/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
serial restart-delay 0
frame-relay traffic-shaping
!
interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point
frame-relay interface-dlci 112 ppp Virtual-Template1
class SHAPE_384K
!
interface Virtual-Template1
bandwidth 384
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ppp multilink
ppp multilink interleave
ppp multilink fragment delay 13
service-policy output CBWFQ
!
map-class frame-relay SHAPE_384K
frame-relay cir 384000
frame-relay bc 3840
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 384000
Solved! Go to Solution.
ā07-10-2012 10:38 AM
Hey Steph,
virtual-templates, act like template configurations which u can call for different interfaces, to my understanding the virtual access is the resemblance of the bind between the template and a physical interface, i believe because a template is never directly in action it is down, but where it is in effect with a physical interface, the binding (virtual access) comes up up.
here in ur original post i saw that you want to do a multilink on Frame Relay VC's, it is called PPP over Frame Relay, so its DLCI membership in a multilink interface is configured with utilizing virtual templates through the below command:
interface serial1/0/0/1:0
frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ppp virtual-template 1
in the other config u shared above, those interfaces are originally using PPP encapsulation, it is different from PPPoFR which u deal with virtual circuits and per DLCI.
HTH
plz Rate helpful posts.
Soroush.
ā07-09-2012 03:23 PM
Hi,
virtual access is a cloned interface, which is created automatically along with the virtual template. as the name of the Virtual-Template implies it is a template used for creating virtual interfaces, whenever u use the template and bind it to an interface n it starts working it creates this virtual access instance.
keep in mind that to make a multilink bundle u need to be able to configure the other end of the connection as MPPP too.
U have to create ur physical FR interfaces, assign class-maps n bind a virtual template to the SVC's u link to be in the bundle:
interface virtual-template X
no ip address
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
and then create the multilink interface and assign ur desired setting to it:
interface multilink X
ip address x.x.x.x
bandwidth xxx
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1 .... (same group number)
ppp multilink fragment delay 13
service-policy output CBWFQ
Hope it Helps,
Soroush.
ā07-10-2012 08:35 AM
Hi Soroush,
Thanks a lot for your reply, a virtual-access is a cloned interface from the virtual-template make sense to me. Can we say that the virtual-access interface can be up or down while virtual-template is always down. What could be the reason for this?
I would like to understand if I can use the following configuration in the case where I want to assing a second interface to the sampe multilink PPP bundle.
interface Serial1/1.1 point-to-point
frame-relay interface-dlci 112 ppp Virtual-Template1
class SHAPE_384K
I think I am confused about the utilization of a virtual Template. I am not sure when a Virtual Template is required or not. In your configuration example, you are using a virtual template.
interface virtual-template X
no ip address
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
interface multilink X
ip address x.x.x.x
bandwidth xxx
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1 .... (same group number)
ppp multilink fragment delay 13
service-policy output CBWFQ
I would assume that the interace configuration would be the following but I am not sure
interface serial1/0/0/1:0
frame-relay inerface-dlci 100 ppp virtual-template 1
But I have also seen configuration example like the following one with no virtual-template. Why in this case, no virtual-template is require.
interface Multilink1
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
!
interface Serial1/4
bandwidth 2000
encapsulation ppp
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
!
interface Serial1/5
bandwidth 4000
encapsulation ppp
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
serial restart-delay 0
Thanks for all your help
Stephane
ā07-10-2012 10:38 AM
Hey Steph,
virtual-templates, act like template configurations which u can call for different interfaces, to my understanding the virtual access is the resemblance of the bind between the template and a physical interface, i believe because a template is never directly in action it is down, but where it is in effect with a physical interface, the binding (virtual access) comes up up.
here in ur original post i saw that you want to do a multilink on Frame Relay VC's, it is called PPP over Frame Relay, so its DLCI membership in a multilink interface is configured with utilizing virtual templates through the below command:
interface serial1/0/0/1:0
frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ppp virtual-template 1
in the other config u shared above, those interfaces are originally using PPP encapsulation, it is different from PPPoFR which u deal with virtual circuits and per DLCI.
HTH
plz Rate helpful posts.
Soroush.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide