10-07-2013 06:42 PM - edited 03-04-2019 09:15 PM
Dear All,
I having a difficulty on the BGP routing issue. I have 2 routers, router A1 and router A2 are running in BGP for routing connection. Currently we setup a site to site VPN from router A2 to router B. Once the VPN connection establish, how to i connect to router B from router A1?
I have attached the diagram and wish anyone can help me answer for it.
Many thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-07-2013 07:21 PM
It looks right. From this config, you'll be able to get to the shared subnet between A2 and B, but what's on the LAN side for B? You'll need to have a static address for that unless you're going to run a routing protocol. On Router B, you'll need a static route for A1 to point to A2 in order to get return traffic from A1 to B and back.
For example, if your lan subnet on Router B is 192.168.5.0/24, on A2 you would create a static route:
ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0
On Router A2, you're redistributing statics, so A1 would know how to get to B since A2 knows and is advertising that to A1.
HTH,
John
*** Please rate all useful posts ***
10-07-2013 06:51 PM
Are you running a routing protocol between the two vpn endpoints? If not, you can simply create statics pointing from Router Office B to Office A1 via Office A2. You can Then redistribute the static into BGP so Office A1 knows how to get to Router Office B.
Another way would be to run a routing protocol between A2 and B over the vpn tunnel, and then perform a mutual redistribution on A2.
HTH,
John
*** Please rate all useful posts ***
10-07-2013 07:16 PM
Hi John
Thanks your suggestion. I try to draft a configuration on these routers. Please correct me if i am wrong on it.
Let assume the site to site VPN is connected.
Office A1:
router bgp 65022
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 172.16.152.0
timers bgp 15 20
redistribute connected
redistribute static
neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx remote-as 8805
neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx weight 100
neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx route-map ADVERTISE-WAN out
no auto-summary
ip prefix-list ADVERTISE-WAN seq 5 permit 172.16.152.0/24
Office A2:
router bgp 65021
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 172.16.153.0
network 192.168.110.0
timers bgp 15 20
redistribute connected
redistribute static
neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx remote-as 8804
neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx weight 100
neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx route-map ADVERTISE-WAN out
no auto-summary
ip prefix-list ADVERTISE-WAN seq 5 permit 172.16.153.0/24
ip prefix-list ADVERTISE-WAN seq 10 permit 192.168.110.0/23
Once the 192.168.110.0/23 is advertised in the WAN routing, Office A1 able to access to office B via WAN cloud. It is possible to access it. Am i correct?
10-07-2013 07:21 PM
It looks right. From this config, you'll be able to get to the shared subnet between A2 and B, but what's on the LAN side for B? You'll need to have a static address for that unless you're going to run a routing protocol. On Router B, you'll need a static route for A1 to point to A2 in order to get return traffic from A1 to B and back.
For example, if your lan subnet on Router B is 192.168.5.0/24, on A2 you would create a static route:
ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0
On Router A2, you're redistributing statics, so A1 would know how to get to B since A2 knows and is advertising that to A1.
HTH,
John
*** Please rate all useful posts ***
10-07-2013 08:12 PM
Hi John,
Thanks for your help. Later I will try it after my office hour and I get back to you for the result.
Thank you very much and appreciate your help.
10-08-2013 04:53 PM
Hi John,
I have tried it and it working prefect to me. Thanks for your solution.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide