11-26-2023 11:02 PM
Hello, among FHRP, please let me know the operating principle of VRRP and HSRP and what is better about HSRP than VRRP.
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-27-2023 07:38 AM
". . . please let me know the operating principle of VRRP and HSRP . . ."
Both provide an interface IP not bound to a single physical device interface. Basically, if whatever physical device interface fails, another physical device may take over.
". . . and what is better about HSRP than VRRP."
Hmm, for most use cases, "better" considerations usually not considered. Technically, I suspect HSRP might be "better", but, personally, when working with Cisco equipment (that also supports VRRP [common now, but wasn't always so]), I would still use HSRP because of its long history. Or, unless I'm working with mixed vendor hardware, why choose VRRP?
However, in a Cisco environment, if I've a need for a FHRP, good chance I might choose Cisco's GLBP.
Also BTW, Cisco's HSRP had some features on higher end platforms not found on lower end platforms. Also, after GLBP, some of its features, and higher end platform features, were incorporated into HSRPv2.
HSRPv2, is "better" than VRRP, but most use cases don't need its enhancements.
11-26-2023 11:20 PM
11-26-2023 11:35 PM
Hi,
In my understanding basically:
VRRP has default hello is lower than HSRP.
VRRP is standard , HSRP is cisco proprietary.
VRRP allow device can use physical IP of device for VIP.
About logical configuration, I think is almost same (just difference about command).
Hope my command is useful !
11-26-2023 11:49 PM
Honestly, neither option is better. They both have more and less. But again it depends on your setup, design and devices/hardware.
Vendor Specificity:
Standards Compliance:
Protocol Number:
Configuration Options:
Advertisement Interval:
Hello Messages:
Preemption:
Authentication:
In summary, while both HSRP and VRRP provide router redundancy for high availability, HSRP is Cisco-specific, simpler to configure, and has fewer options, while VRRP is an open standard with more configuration options, making it suitable for multi-vendor environments. The choice between them often depends on the specific requirements of the network and the equipment used.
11-27-2023 01:07 AM
Hello @sjrcoel
The choice between HSRP and VRRP often depends on the specific requirements and the networking equipment in use. HSRP is a Cisco-proprietary protocol, but it is supported on a variety of vendor devices. HSRP allows for more granular configuration options compared to VRRP.
11-27-2023 07:38 AM
". . . please let me know the operating principle of VRRP and HSRP . . ."
Both provide an interface IP not bound to a single physical device interface. Basically, if whatever physical device interface fails, another physical device may take over.
". . . and what is better about HSRP than VRRP."
Hmm, for most use cases, "better" considerations usually not considered. Technically, I suspect HSRP might be "better", but, personally, when working with Cisco equipment (that also supports VRRP [common now, but wasn't always so]), I would still use HSRP because of its long history. Or, unless I'm working with mixed vendor hardware, why choose VRRP?
However, in a Cisco environment, if I've a need for a FHRP, good chance I might choose Cisco's GLBP.
Also BTW, Cisco's HSRP had some features on higher end platforms not found on lower end platforms. Also, after GLBP, some of its features, and higher end platform features, were incorporated into HSRPv2.
HSRPv2, is "better" than VRRP, but most use cases don't need its enhancements.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide