01-04-2013 07:37 AM - edited 03-04-2019 06:34 PM
01-04-2013 07:52 AM
Can each router ping its neighbor's loopback? I presume R1 and R5 are OK, but worth checking the rest.
01-04-2013 08:36 AM
Hi,
in your AS 100 you need a static route on R2 and R4 for each BGP peer address otherwise they won't form a neighbourship( as seen with show ip bgp summary on both routers, you'll see they only peer with R3)
You also need a static route for each link to the eBGP peers on all routers in AS 100 otherwise you would need next-hop-self on the border routers in AS 100 but you can't use this feature.
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
01-04-2013 08:53 PM
R2 is forming neighbourship with R4, but its flapping.I know adding a RR or static route will solve the problem. But my issue is that why peering between R2 - R4 is flapping ? Someone told me that R2 is learning the R4 connected route from BGP peering which inturn it uses to form peering. Thats why its flapping. Is it so?
01-06-2013 11:57 PM
Hi,
yes, I've seen the same behaviour in a lab some years ago.
You need static routes Alain mentioned to make your BGP stable.
BR,
Milan
01-07-2013 02:47 AM
Hi,
Use route-reflector client command in r3
01-07-2013 06:06 AM
Hi,
will that work without next-hop-self command?
BR,
Milan
01-08-2013 12:38 PM
Hi Milan,
Dont fully mesh AS100 -
so the peering should be - R1 (as200) to R2 (as100) to R3 (as100) to R4 (as100) to R5 (as300)
then configure R2 & R4 as route-reflector clients from R3.
No statics required and that should do it.
res
paul
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide