01-27-2010 10:40 PM - edited 03-04-2019 07:19 AM
Hello
If anyone has done this before or have ideas please share me youre ideas. We have 2 separate networks and suddenly
decided to implement a capability tthat their voip can call each other w/o passing thru PSTN. We gonna put a separate
dedicated link (Fiber). But the problem is their using same network 192.x.x.x. I'm thinkin about address tanslation but
kinda tricky for me. Were using CME 4.0 in 3800 series and 4 digits local extension and 7 to the other side.
I really appreciate it if you share youre ideas w/ me. Thanks
01-27-2010 11:05 PM
On each network I'd put the phones on seperate VLAN/Subnet. For example...
Network 1
Workstations 192.168.100.0/24
Phones 192.168.101.0/24
Network 2
Workstations 192.168.100.0/24
Phones 192.168.102.0/24
01-31-2010 02:10 AM
Hi
Sorry for the late reply.. Not possible.. i forgot to mention that both network is already
existing and in production. And a lot of their network block is the same. I'm thinking
it's going to be address translation. but very tricky.
01-31-2010 04:54 AM
Understood. However, with careful planning it wouldn't take much to move the phones over to a new network. To reduce your exposure you could move a few phones at a time. Either way good luck.
01-31-2010 07:48 AM
Thanks a lot mate... That would really work if the current plan is approved w/c is b/w 50 to 100 phones only on each
side that are allowed to call each other.. But I think it's going to be a problem if they suddenly decide to change it
to all off the phones should be w/c is around estimate of 2000 to 3000 phones of all sides at least. I
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide