05-29-2012 10:00 AM - edited 03-04-2019 04:30 PM
hi everyone,
so i just got a t1 line and when i configure the IP address i get this error message
Illegal HDLC serial type code 972, PC=0x213FEF40
before this error comes, i am able to ping for about 5 seconds, after the error the port shuts down.
now, i found out that this is because the router received a piece of information and it doesnt know what to do with it, and it has to do with encapsulation.
im a little green about cisco routers, so i was wondering if someone can help me figure out how to fix this. I talk with the isp and they told me that there's nothing they can do to help. they provided me with an adtran t1 device so i can connect it to the ethernet port but i dont have any ethernet port left on the router so i need to use the t1 port.
is there anyway i can configure the router to ignore that error? because im assuming that if im beeing able to ping for a couple seconds until that error it means that outside that error everything is fine.
i dont know if it matters but i have a cisco 1921 router..
thanks,
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-29-2012 12:14 PM
j.blakley wrote:
If it works while connected to the ethernet port, the circuit is configured for FR. It's best that you contact them for the settings that you need. If you have the interface up while configured for FR (as you are now), does the interface go up/up?
yes its serial0/0/0 is up, line protocol is up
05-29-2012 12:44 PM
Ok...how are you testing? From the router, you should be able to ping your provider. I'm assuming they're at 1.1.1.2 since you're using .1 on a /30. You can try to ping them from the router. If that's successful, your circuit is up but you'll need to configure your router for natting.
HTH,
John
Please rate all useful posts..
05-29-2012 01:30 PM
j.blakley wrote:
Ok...how are you testing? From the router, you should be able to ping your provider. I'm assuming they're at 1.1.1.2 since you're using .1 on a /30. You can try to ping them from the router. If that's successful, your circuit is up but you'll need to configure your router for natting.
HTH,
John
Please rate all useful posts..
without the frame-relay i would configure the ip address and i would be able to ping the ISP for a couple of seconds until the HDLC error comes up after that it goes down and i cant bring it up again for a while.
with the frame-relay command i cant ping at all.
05-29-2012 01:50 PM
You'll need to contact the ISP to get the appropriate settings. They have FR configured on their router and that should translate to the Cisco with no issues. The fact that the interface comes up and stays up is proof enough that FR encapsulation is used. The only thing you haven't done is change the encapsulation type:
int s0/0/0.500
encapsulat frame-relay ietf
05-29-2012 02:23 PM
j.blakley wrote:
You'll need to contact the ISP to get the appropriate settings. They have FR configured on their router and that should translate to the Cisco with no issues. The fact that the interface comes up and stays up is proof enough that FR encapsulation is used. The only thing you haven't done is change the encapsulation type:
int s0/0/0.500
encapsulat frame-relay ietf
success!!
that did the trick, thank you so much for you help.
i am able to ping now,altough the interface s0/0/0.500 disappeared for some reason.this is my sh run output
!
no aaa new-model
!
!
no ipv6 cef
ip source-route
ip cef
!
!
!
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.50
!
ip dhcp pool bartz
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.1.1
dns-server
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
no ip address
shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description inside
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
no mop enabled
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description Outside
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0/0
description T1
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
!
ip default-gateway 2.2.2.2
ip forward-protocol nd
!
ip http server
ip http access-class 23
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000
!
ip nat inside source list 101 interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.20 80 interface GigabitEthernet0/1 80
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/1
ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2
!
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 any
!
!
!
!
!
!
05-29-2012 02:28 PM
David,
Glad to hear, although I'm a bit confused How are you able to get a response with no address on the interface? Try this since changing the encapsulation type worked:
interface Serial0/0/0.500 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 500
The next thing will be to get your natting set up after you get the pings working across the link. When you get this set up, post:
"sh frame-relay map"
HTH,
John
05-29-2012 02:45 PM
j.blakley wrote:
David,
Glad to hear, although I'm a bit confused How are you able to get a response with no address on the interface? Try this since changing the encapsulation type worked:
interface Serial0/0/0.500 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 500
The next thing will be to get your natting set up after you get the pings working across the link. When you get this set up, post:
"sh frame-relay map"
HTH,
John
i did the s0/0/0.500 and this is the output for the sh frame-relay map
Router#sh frame-relay map
Serial0/0/0.500 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 500(0x1F4,0x7C40), broadcast, BW = 1536000
status defined, active
05-29-2012 03:13 PM
Ok. It looks like everything is running now. You can look at your running config and should be able to see the address on the subinterface now. Hopefully
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
05-29-2012 03:18 PM
j.blakley wrote:
Ok. It looks like everything is running now. You can look at your running config and should be able to see the address on the subinterface now. Hopefully
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
yes and i used the extended ping to make sure i am using that interface and ip address and it worked, so now i have to work on the routing, thanks for all the help
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide