07-01-2005 02:36 AM - edited 03-03-2019 09:56 AM
Hello,
I connect two Cisco 2600 router using aux ports (back-to-back). The IP address of first router async interface is 172.16.4.1/24 and the second is 172.16.4.2/24.
Output from "show ip ro" shows on routers shows both the subnet 172.16.4.0/24 and the host route 172.16.4.1/32 (on first router).
Can anyone explain why the host route is installed in the routing table ?
Thanks
Duong
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-01-2005 02:59 AM
Normally I would expect to see a host route in each router to the other router's interface. This is installed by the PPP when they compare IP addresses during the IPCP phase. You can prevent it with the interface command no peer neighbor-route.
Kevin Dorrell
Luxembourg
07-01-2005 02:59 AM
Normally I would expect to see a host route in each router to the other router's interface. This is installed by the PPP when they compare IP addresses during the IPCP phase. You can prevent it with the interface command no peer neighbor-route.
Kevin Dorrell
Luxembourg
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide