cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2367
Views
0
Helpful
14
Replies

is this a valid setup?

Hi Everybody,

I tried to ping 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.1 but does not ping. Just wondered if its a valid setup.

Please let me know if there is any config mistake or any aditional config is required. Any link to understand froming etherchannel on a vlan will also be helpful.

Thanks,

Ravi

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi Ravi

try the bellow config with simple changes

hostname multi_switch

!

!

vlan 10
name Vlan_10


interface FastEthernet0/1

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode desirable

switchport access vlan 10

!

interface FastEthernet0/2

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode desirable

switchport access vlan 10

!

interface FastEthernet0/3

!

interface Port-channel 1
switchport access vlan 10
no shut
!

interface Vlan1

no ip address

shutdown

!

interface Vlan10

ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut


################################################


hostname Switch

!

!

!

vlan 10
name Vlan_10

interface FastEthernet0/1

switchport access vlan 10

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

!

interface FastEthernet0/2

switchport access vlan 10

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

!

interface FastEthernet0/3

switchport access vlan 10

interface Port-channel 1
switchport access vlan 10
no shut

Good luck


View solution in original post

14 Replies 14

lgijssel
Level 9
Level 9

This is certainly a valid setup.

Problem may be with you port channel configuration but recently there was a similar "cannot ping" problem in which the windows firewall was the culprit. This could be the case here as well.

Config info for etherchannel:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/12.1_4_ea1/configuration/guide/swethchl.html

regards,

Leo

johnlloyd_13
Level 9
Level 9

hi ravi,

try to replace trunk links between switches with cross-cables (represented as dashed lines) and test again.

Marwan ALshawi
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Make the etherchannel based on the protocol either

Auto desirable

Or

Auto active

Make sure you etherchannel is up

Show etherchannel summary

HTH

Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

I will paste the configure again and paste the config and the results. My collegues say its not a valid setup but thanks now I know its a valid set up.

Regards,

Ravi

Hi All,

Please find the config below:

L3/multilayer (still being used in l2)

hostname multi_switch

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

switchport access vlan 10

!

interface FastEthernet0/2

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

switchport access vlan 10

!

interface FastEthernet0/3

!

interface Port-channel 1

!

interface Vlan1

no ip address

shutdown

!

interface Vlan10

ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

!

ip classless

Switch

hostname Switch

!

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

switchport access vlan 10

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

!

interface FastEthernet0/2

switchport access vlan 10

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

!

interface FastEthernet0/3

switchport access vlan 10

!

interface FastEthernet0/4

PC IP : 192.168.1.2/24

Now, is there any config issue in this?

Still unable to ping...below is the ether channel summary:

On multiswitch:

Number of channel-groups in use: 1

Number of aggregators:           1

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports

------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------

1      Po1(SU)           PAgP   Fa0/1(P) Fa0/2(P)

On nomal l2 switch:

Number of channel-groups in use: 1

Number of aggregators:           1

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports

------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------

1      Po1(SU)           PAgP   Fa0/1(P) Fa0/2(P)

i am not able to figure out where exactly is the issue.

Regads,

Ravi


Hi Ravi

try the bellow config with simple changes

hostname multi_switch

!

!

vlan 10
name Vlan_10


interface FastEthernet0/1

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode desirable

switchport access vlan 10

!

interface FastEthernet0/2

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode desirable

switchport access vlan 10

!

interface FastEthernet0/3

!

interface Port-channel 1
switchport access vlan 10
no shut
!

interface Vlan1

no ip address

shutdown

!

interface Vlan10

ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut


################################################


hostname Switch

!

!

!

vlan 10
name Vlan_10

interface FastEthernet0/1

switchport access vlan 10

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

!

interface FastEthernet0/2

switchport access vlan 10

channel-protocol pagp

channel-group 1 mode auto

!

interface FastEthernet0/3

switchport access vlan 10

interface Port-channel 1
switchport access vlan 10
no shut

Good luck


Hi Marwanshawi,

Let me give it a go and let you. Keep you updated.

Regards,

Ravi

pls check is this config required under interface ?

#switchport access vlan 10

Hi,

No mate. adding the vlan in the portchannel did not help.

Regards,

Ravi

Guys,

It did not work. I have been trying this. Till now no luck. I have tried all the above. Not working.

Any assistance will be hightly appreciated.

Regards,

Ravi

Ravi,

Can you please post the output of the show etherchannel summary from both switches? Thank you!

Best regards,

Peter

Hi Peter,

multilayer

Number of channel-groups in use: 1

Number of aggregators:           1

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports

------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------

1      Po1(SU)           PAgP   Fa0/1(P) Fa0/2(P)

Normal:

Number of channel-groups in use: 1

Number of aggregators:           1

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports

------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------

1      Po1(SU)           PAgP   Fa0/1(P) Fa0/2(P)

Please do let me know if you need any other information.

Regards,

Ravi

Ravi,

Neither me nor other friends here have spotted a problem, and this is really a very basic configuration. If you are trying to configure this in Packet Tracer, be warned that the Packet Tracer may not be simulating this kind of configuration properly. In that case, we are trying to find a bug where none exists. Do you have an option of testing this on a real equipment?

Best regards,

Peter

Hi All,

It works fine. I just need to wait 5 sec before I can start pining. I think adding the vlan to the portchannels resolved the issue.

Thanks All.

Cheers!

Ravi